Organizational behavior
Behavioral Anchored Rating Scales (BARS) Example: Oral Communication and Problem Analysis & Resolution
This document presents example behavioral anchored rating scales (BARS) for two key performance dimensions: Oral Communication and Problem Analysis & Resolution. BARS provide a structured and objective approach to performance evaluation, offering clear anchors that define specific behaviors related to each dimension.
Oral Communication:
Description: This dimension assesses an employee's ability to communicate effectively in both written and verbal formats. It encompasses clarity, organization, comprehension, and appropriate use of language and non-verbal cues.
Rating Scale:
| Rating | Anchor |
| 1 | Expresses ideas clearly and concisely. |
| 2 | Answers questions completely and precisely. Speaks with a voice that exhibits an appropriate command presence. |
| 3 | Relates thoughts in an organized manner. Gives concise answers to questions. Demonstrates effective active listening behaviors (e.g., leans forward, nods in agreement, repeats statements back, verbalizes understanding). |
| 4 | Clearly enunciates words. Attentively leans forward. |
| 5 | Voices ideas randomly or several at a time. |
| 6 | Interrupts others inappropriately. Excessive use of filler words, phrases (umm, like I said, etc.) |
| 7 | Fails to listen to questions asked by role player(s). Uses incorrect words or grammar in responding to questions. |
| 8 | Takes too long without making a point. |
| 9 | Uses profanity. |
Problem Analysis & Resolution:
Description: This dimension evaluates an employee's ability to effectively identify, analyze, and resolve problems. It focuses on critical thinking, problem-solving skills, resourcefulness, and the ability to consider potential solutions and implications.
Rating Scale:
| Rating | Anchor |
| 1 | Identifies possible resources to resolve problem. Deals with problems before they worsen. |
| 2 | Ensures a follow up plan is established. Develops alternative approaches to deal with the problem. Verbalizes the impact on the organization as a whole (morale, operations, budget, etc.). Thoroughly considers relevant information. |
| 3 | Provides feasible solutions; considered feasibility of alternatives. Makes suggestions for resolving the problem. |
| 4 | Assures adherence to standards. |
| 5 | Is unable to support conclusions with facts or logic. |
| 6 | Fails to consider alternatives. |
| 7 | Considers only a portion of the available information. Abdicates responsibility, blames others. |
| 8 | Waits until a problem has worsened before dealing with the problem. |
| 9 | Fails to act. |
Benefits of Using BARS:
-
Clarity and Objectivity: BARS provide clear and specific behavioral anchors, reducing subjectivity and improving the consistency of performance evaluations.
-
Improved Feedback: The behavioral descriptions provide concrete examples of effective and ineffective behaviors, enabling more constructive and actionable feedback for employees.
-
Enhanced Development: By understanding the specific behaviors required for success, employees can identify areas for improvement and focus on developing the necessary skills.
-
Improved Communication: BARS facilitate open and constructive dialogue between supervisors and employees, enhancing communication and understanding regarding performance expectations.
Conclusion:
BARS offer a valuable tool for organizations seeking to improve performance evaluation processes, promote fairness, and support employee development. By providing clear behavioral expectations and facilitating constructive feedback, BARS can contribute to a more objective and effective performance management system.