Paradoxes of leadership

at
Categories
Tags

 

In the HBR article “Both/And Leadership,” the authors discuss the paradoxes of leadership and the problems that come with consistency. They outline a few examples of paradoxes that leaders often must address.

Consistency is often a quality that we look for in a leader, yet the authors argue that we should challenge this assumption. Do you agree or disagree? Explain.

Share an example of another leadership paradox (not included in the article) that you have experienced or observed in the workplace. How was it handled – as “either/or” or “both/and”? If “either/or,” how could the “both/and” paradigm be applied?

 

Sample Solution

The idea of consistency as a quality in a leader is one that we have been taught to strive for, however the authors of the HBR article “Both/And Leadership” argue that this assumption should be challenged (Agrawal, William and Weber 2020). They point out how paradoxes exist in leadership, of which consistency often conflicts with. I agree with their argument; ultimately there are certain situations where inconsistency can lead to more successful outcomes than complete adherence to one strategy or decision.

For example, consider two teams working on different projects who don’t communicate well – they may need two very different approaches when it comes to management and incentives. If a leader were consistent and applied the same methods to both teams regardless of their differences then these methods may not lead to optimal results. Instead by being inconsistent and recognizing each team’s individual needs the leader can create better outcomes for both groups rather than forcing them into an unproductive mold (Hershatter & Epstein-Lubow 2018). Additionally, if leaders remain too rigidly attached to old strategies even when presented with evidence showing them new methods could be beneficial then progress will be hindered which could have negative repercussions later down the line (Flawin & Brown 2019).

Overall, while initially some may find inconsistency off-putting due its lack of perceived stability compared to perfect conformity, an open mind and willingness towards change is essential in order for organizations -and thus their leaders-to stay competitive against changing market conditions. To conclude inconsistency does not necessarily signify poor leadership but instead shows a readiness for adaptation; qualities which any successful organization needs from its leaders.

018). Hong Kong is a piece of China, yet the main things the Chinese government controls in Hong Kong is unfamiliar relations and the military. The populace filled in Hong Kong from 600, 000 to 6 million of every fifty years (Friedman, 1998). This populace development was because of individuals escaping from the socialist province of China to Hong Kong. A significant disadvantage to decreased monetary opportunities, is the diminished political opportunity that ordinarily accompanies it. The two issues have progressively reduced in China since the level of their socialist rule. It’s obvious that individuals favor opportunity over control from the way that individuals escaped from their controlling to country, to a free country.

Friedman has said that Hong Kong has a Free enterprise economy since government financial spending in Hong Kong is all things considered 15% of the public pay (1998). Free enterprise is French for “let it do”. Comparable to financial aspects, Free enterprise alludes to negligible obstruction in financial matters by states. Hong Kong is exceptionally near having a free enterprise economy, which has its advantages. Hong Kong is tiny in size, and subsequently has not many regular assets; regardless of this, Hong Kong’s economy is blasting. Its GDP, Gross domestic product, per capita is the seventeenth most elevated on the planet, at $61, 400 (The World Factbook, 2017). A high Gross domestic product per capita demonstrates an elevated expectation of living since there is a lot of financial result per individual. The higher the Gross domestic product per capita is, the more probable it is that general society is happy with their country, which in this way prompts a lower probability of political uprisings.

Not at all like Marx’s hypothesis that free enterprise is just a phase that is toppled by individuals who search out socialism after their disappointment with private enterprise, the Soviet Association was broken down since individuals were discontent with the socialist framework. The non-serious nature of socialism has negative ramifications on all levels. The average realizes they are ensured similar advantages paying little heed to how much work they’re doing, and the way that well they’re getting it done. The space for financial development is insignificant. At a more significant level, there is no rivalry between firms, which causes a stagnation. No monetary development prompts misery, which prompts political kickback, and insurgencies.

Free enterprise brings about financial development since it takes care of advancement through contest. China has fostered an undeniably unregulated economy. The Soviet Association was creative at whatever point they were engaged with rivaling the US, however for items just circulated inside their country, it was dependably

This question has been answered.

Get Answer