According to psychology professor, Patrick Hill, the personality traits of optimism, friendliness, and conscientiousness contribute to longevity (https://www.gwern.net/docs/conscientiousness/2011-hill.pdf (Links to an external site.)). A study of hundreds of hundred-year-old people found that they were more easygoing than the general population (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3384436/) (Links to an external site.). Friendliness is another characteristic of longevity (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3259159/ (Links to an external site.)). People who are friendly live longer. Conscientiousness is also linked to longevity. These people are detail-oriented and responsible, always want to do a good job, and are punctual.
Conscientiousness and optimism are covered in the text. Moreover, the trait of friendliness can be inferred from the discussion of good interpersonal skills in Chapter 1.
In a three-page paper, address the following four questions. Follow APA format, and use each question for a section heading.
What was your score on The Conscientiousness Quiz in the text? Does you score suggest that you will live at least 100 years?
Why would a person with a high degree of optimism make a better manager, sales representative, or coworker?
Why would a conscientious person live longer, as well as performing better on the job?
Imagine that you are the HR director at a large company. Why would it help the company to hire many employees who are optimistic, friendly, and conscientious?
ddition to encouraging discovery, individuals likewise seem to experience issues in separating from compromising boosts (Koster et al., 2004). This may potentially clarify the more drawn out direct look length saw in the current examination. From a developmental point of view, organic readiness empowers people to distinguish and concentrate on conceivably undermining boosts to build the opportunity of endurance (Sussman et al., 2016). Driven by improved mindfulness, look can be utilized to focus on sources or signals of dangers in nature. In the conversational undertaking, symbols were the significant social targets and given the majority of the data in collaboration. The majority of the feeling acknowledgment examines have demonstrated that individuals’ consideration is generally committed to the most indicative or remarkable area of danger related improvements (Schurgin et al., 2014). Reliable with this, members looked longer at symbol’s face, particularly the eye area, when the feeling of danger expanded. Eyes are significant mostly in light of the fact that they can show one’s visual consideration in space (Kolkmeier, 2015). By seeing symbol’s eye locale, members might pick up data to figure out where the danger is found. As the relational separation became over-proxemic, the symbol could be the wellspring of danger to members. Subsequently, it would be significant for members to know whether they were the objectives of symbol’s forceful methodology by investigating symbol’s eyes. Likewise, the eye locale additionally generally encourages face recognition (Gilad et al., 2009). In undermining circumstances, it is pivotal for individuals to accumulate data effectively. Consequently, members would will in general get familiar with t