Sample Solution

indicators, and the harshness of slumps between the pre-1916 and post 1945 periods, there is enough indication to assume that slumps reduced and became constant.
The influence of the Keynesian stabilization policies included stretching the post-1945 growths and averting extreme economic recessions (Romer,C 1992). It is apparent that the increased impact and spread of Keynesianism can be credited to a conservative opinion that economic stability during the post-war era was quite higher than in the pre-1914 era, which was depicted by the Keynesian revolution in economic strategies. The point is that the rise of Keynesianism is credited to incomparable economic success during the period between the end of the second World War and 1973 industrial market economies. This was because Keynesianism emphasized the significance of fiscal policy, which caused in the perfected economic execution during the “Golden Age” epoch (Atesoglu, H.1999).
Great functioning can be accredited to an intensification in the liberalization of the universal trade and transactions, uplifting economic strategies that led to minimal inflation rates in terms of buoyant aggregate demand, the amplified governmental support of buoyant internal demand, and the accretion of growth potentialities after the end of the second World. For example, GDP per capita in Western Europe augmented by 4.08 per cent during 1950-1973, the growth and expansion were seen in centrally designed economies, such as Africa , Latin America, and Asia.
The “Peak” of unrivaled economic success finished after 1973, with the economic stagnation of the 1970s steering to the fall of Keynesianism. The 1970s stagnation was described by the rising rates of inflation and unemployment, and the cut-rate of economic growth. According to Keynesian criticizers, the economic stagnation credited to the erroneous expansionary strategies embraced under the disguise of Keynesian economy. For example, from 1960 until 2002, average unemployment and infla