Police were unable to obtain significant information from victims of sexual assault

at
Categories
Tags

 

You are a Victim’s Advocate for persons who have been sexually assaulted. You have been effective in recent past cases where police were unable to obtain significant information from victims of sexual assault. When you provided advocacy service to these victims, you discovered that police interviews were done in a manner that indicated police were in charge, that the victim needed to cooperate if he or she were to be believed, and wanted anything done about the reported crime.
The Chief of Major Crimes wants you to explain why police interviews of victims are not successful and what the major crimes detectives can do to increase their effectiveness in interviewing them.
Resource: Post Interview Survey Safe Passage © 2003 43 Center Street, Suite G • Northampton , MA 01060-3004 • www.safepass.org
Focus your discussion on the following:
Provide an explanation of why it is important to establish and build a rapport with victims before beginning the interview.
Prepare a list of the most important factors that police officers should include in their victim interview strategy for those who are reporting they have been sexually assaulted.
Explain why it is important to modify the interview based on the factors that you listed.

 

 

 

Sample Solution 

As a Victim’s Advocate for persons who have been sexually assaulted, I believe it is important to establish and build rapport with victims before beginning an interview so they feel more comfortable discussing the incident. This can be done by creating a non-threatening environment such as providing them with information about available resources or allowing them to choose where the conversation will take place (Safe Passage). Additionally, officers should make sure that they are speaking in terms that are easy to understand while also making sure not to jump ahead too quickly since this may cause some people to become overwhelmed by the magnitude of what is being discussed (Safe Passage).

When interviewing victims who report having been sexually assaulted there are several key elements which must be included in order for the discussion to be effective. First and foremost, it is essential for detectives to ensure that all questions asked remain focused on gathering facts about what happened along with any other relevant details related to the case; leading statements or insinuating facts from one’s own interpretations should be avoided since such tactics could taint evidence collected during this process (Safe Passage). Furthermore, investigators need pay attention to maintaining an unbiased demeanor throughout so each individual feels heard without judgment while simultaneously building trust between both parties involved (Safe Passage).

Lastly, it is critical that police modify their interviews based on various factors because every person has different needs when talking about traumatic events. For example, sensitive topics such as sexual history require special handling so readers do not feel ashamed or embarrassed plus language used should be tailored accordingly depending on age group or cultural background of victim; these precautions help create a safe space where individuals feel respected and inspired enough courage speak freely without fear of reprisal (Safe Passage).

In conclusion, providing advocacy services has shown me why proper preparation and implementation of police interviews is essential when obtaining important details concerning sexual assault cases. By establishing rapport with victims prior engaging in discourse along with avoiding leading questions while utilizing appropriate terminology based off situational context these discussions will become more successful ensuing higher chances of prosecutors successfully prosecuting offenders.

Transient memory is the memory for a boost that goes on for a brief time (Carlson, 2001). In reasonable terms visual transient memory is frequently utilized for a relative reason when one can’t thoroughly search in two spots immediately however wish to look at least two prospects. Tuholski and partners allude to momentary memory similar to the attendant handling and stockpiling of data (Tuholski, Engle, and Baylis, 2001).

They additionally feature the way that mental capacity can frequently be antagonistically impacted by working memory limit. It means quite a bit to be sure about the typical limit of momentary memory as, without a legitimate comprehension of the flawless cerebrum’s working it is challenging to evaluate whether an individual has a shortage in capacity (Parkin, 1996).

 

This survey frames George Miller’s verifiable perspective on transient memory limit and how it tends to be impacted, prior to bringing the examination state-of-the-art and outlining a determination of approaches to estimating momentary memory limit. The verifiable perspective on momentary memory limit

 

Length of outright judgment

The range of outright judgment is characterized as the breaking point to the precision with which one can distinguish the greatness of a unidimensional boost variable (Miller, 1956), with this cutoff or length generally being around 7 + 2. Mill operator refers to Hayes memory length try as proof for his restricting range. In this members needed to review data read resoundingly to them and results obviously showed that there was a typical maximum restriction of 9 when double things were utilized.

This was regardless of the consistent data speculation, which has proposed that the range ought to be long if each introduced thing contained little data (Miller, 1956). The end from Hayes and Pollack’s tests (see figure 1) was that how much data sent expansions in a straight design alongside how much data per unit input (Miller, 1956). Figure 1. Estimations of memory for data wellsprings of various sorts and bit remainders, contrasted with anticipated results for steady data. Results from Hayes (left) and Pollack (right) refered to by (Miller, 1956)

 

Pieces and lumps

Mill operator alludes to a ‘digit’ of data as need might have arisen ‘to settle on a choice between two similarly probable other options’. In this manner a basic either or choice requires the slightest bit of data; with more expected for additional complicated choices, along a twofold pathway (Miller, 1956). Decimal digits are worth 3.3 pieces each, implying that a 7-digit telephone number (what is handily recollected) would include 23 pieces of data. Anyway an evident inconsistency to this is the way that, assuming an English word is worth around 10 pieces and just 23 pieces could be recollected then just 2-3 words could be recalled at any one time, clearly mistaken. The restricting range can all the more likely be figured out concerning the absorption of pieces into lumps.

Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the qualification being that a lump is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can differ generally (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option enormous pieces right away, fairly that as each piece turns out to be more recognizable, it tends to be accli

This question has been answered.

Get Answer