Population health POLICY BRIEF

at
Categories
Tags

 

Policy brief: public and/or population health issue
Paper details:
– Identify and select a public and/or population health issue from any health arena.
– Construct a public and/or population health POLICY BRIEF to address the health issue.

 

Sample Solution

The public and population health issue that I have selected to focus on is food insecurity. Food insecurity is a complex, multi-faceted problem which affects millions of people from all walks of life throughout the United States each year. It can lead to poor nutrition, physical and mental health issues, and educational disparities (Coleman-Jensen et al., 2020). The majority of those affected by this issue are children, elderly individuals and low-income households (Reeves et al., 2019).

To address this issue, it is essential that governments implement comprehensive policies which tackle food insecurity at both the individual and systemic level. At the individual level, social safety net programs such as SNAP should be maintained or expanded so those who are struggling financially can access healthy foods without additional financial burden (Coleman-Jensen et al., 2020). Additionally, government subsidies could also be used to help lower the cost of certain nutritious foods such as fresh fruits and vegetables for those who may not qualify for other assistance programs.

At a systemic level, policy makers should consider investing more resources into community initiatives which help ensure everyone has access to adequate nutrition; these include providing free meals for school age children during summer months when many schools are closed or expanding urban farming programs so families can grow their own produce in areas with limited grocery store availability (Reeves et al., 2019). Furthermore, incentives for grocery stores located in food deserts could help increase availability of healthy options in these communities while also creating much needed job opportunities (Ahmed & Umble 2018) Lastly, improving education around nutrition and making it easier to understand how best to prepare meals within limited budgets should be a priority as well since lack of knowledge may contribute greatly towards this issue.

In conclusion, combating food insecurity requires thoughtful policy interventions at multiple levels. By focusing on both individual needs through safety net programs as well as larger systemic changes such as expanding affordable nutrition education initiatives we can work toward ensuring no one goes hungry again.

This article examines and attempts to explain public scepticism surrounding the European Union (coined Euroskepticism). Since 1990, there has been an increasing move to make European Union decision making more democratic with increased oversight of national parliaments, greater powers for the European Parliament, majority voting within the Council, and an increase in EU referendums. This has sought to bring to an end to an era where European elites bargained treaties in the shadow of an apathetic and generally approving public. Hooghe seeks to understand what drives European Union decision making in the modern era, as well as Euroskepticism. This move was embodied in the rejection of the European Constitutional Treaty in 2005, forcing a rethink of the permissive consensus that the people in charge of the European Union were above accountability. To this day, the matter of European integration has been strictly labelled as a contentious issue.

Hooghe begins his examination by establishing two, diametrically opposed theories of European Union politics. One theory is a bottom up view of preference formation. In this argument, voter’s preferences provide a structure of incentives for party position in the context of electoral competition. Whichever party can best capitalise on voter preferences will be better situated to acquire political power. In the context of the European Union, policy makers must gauge the public mood on European integration and make decisions from that.

 

 

Another theory is the top down approach, whereby political parties cue and directly influence the opinions and decisions of the public. Political parties, according to this theory, hold the ideological maps to help navigate highly technical and multi-faceted issues (such as those facing European integration). The public can rarely grasp the complexities of these issues, and thus look to political parties for guidance.

Hooghe, in his analysis, agrees with the bottom up approach to explain Euroskepticism. Euroskepticism, then, is best understood as a rational response by citizens (and thus political parties) for whom centralized European Union power is a threat to their own personal interests, not as a result of dissent o

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.
Hi, how can I help?