Sample Solution

War contributed enormously to Roman extension and the region they aggregated accordingly. It has been proposed that the Romans effectively looked for war as a method of overcoming a new area and extending their domain. Notwithstanding, it appears to be more probable that generally the Romans didn’t make war pointlessly. War was viewed as a fair and hallowed act, demonstrated by the sanctuaries worked to commend triumph and the collection of new divine beings from places they prevailed. These customs bolster the possibility that Romans held war in high respect and would regularly require a reason before doing battle. Their promise to the military was so instilled and the dread of discipline so extreme that warriors would not desert their gathering in any event, when passing was sure. Polybius expresses, “Men in covering powers frequently pick unavoidable passing, declining to leave their positions in any event, when limitlessly dwarfed, inferable from fear of discipline they would later face.” (Polybius 376) Soldiers were additionally an important advantage for Rome, the force and size of the military gave Rome authenticity to stop remote forces from intrusion yet in addition gain support from the individuals of Rome. Frequently when another domain was vanquished their tax collection would be as capable men to go about as officers in the Roman armed force. Utilizing the hour of an important general or losing officers lives without an admirable motivation would have not appeared well and good, and hence futile war is a dishonorable cost. This thought is upheld by the thorough prerequisites that go into war readiness just as the general manner of the Romans. Polybius says about the Romans, “they don’t need them to make assaults or start hostil