Prevention of Drug and Substance Abuse Campaign

at
Categories
Tags

Prepare a PowerPoint presentation of 10-12 slides, including title and reference slides, that analyzes your communication campaign project. Your group’s presentation should address the following:

Discuss the strengths/weakness of your campaign.
Identify improvements you would make if you were to do this again and why those improvements are necessary.
Describe how communication theories guided your campaign.
Explain how your campaign fit into current societal discourse – what themes did your campaign contribute to or work against (e.g., reinforced healthy living)

Sample Solution

The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) is leading a global effort to raise awareness about the huge threat that illicit drugs pose to society as a whole, and particularly to the youth. The campaign’s purpose is to rally support and motivate individuals to take action against drug abuse. UNODC urges individuals, non-profit organizations, the commercial sector, and Member States to participate in as many awareness-raising events as possible around the world by: Organizing outreach or institutional events to commemorate the International Day Against Drug Abuse and Illicit Trafficking, which falls on June 26th.
Using your own networks and contacts to spread the news about the campaign Making use of

Possibility based hypotheses of authority propose that there is no right or most effective way to lead a gathering, or association, because of the huge number of imperatives on a circumstance (Flinsch-Rodriguez, 2019). Fiedler, in his Contingency Theory of Leadership (Fiedler, 1967), recommends that the viability of a gathering is reliant upon the administration styles of the pioneer and their favourability to the circumstance. A significant part of the hypothesis is laid out around the most un-favored associate scale (LPC). The LPC expects to evaluate a potential chiefs way to deal with an undertaking on a size of relationship inspired to task spurred, where the pioneer fits on the scale permits what is going on to be derived, and in this manner permits the distinguishing proof of reasonable pioneers for errands. The favourableness of the circumstance relies upon three attributes: pioneer part relations, the help and trust the pioneer as from the gathering; task structure, the lucidity of the errand to the pioneer; and positional power, the power the pioneer needs to evaluate a gatherings execution and give prizes and disciplines (Fiedler, 1967). In the event that the pioneers approach matches what is expected from going on, achievement is anticipated for the gathering. Fiedler’s possibility model offers an exceptionally severe categorisation of initiative, obviously characterizing which circumstances endlessly won’t bring about progress for a likely pioneer. At the senior administration level of a hierarchal construction inside an association the hypothesis can be applied unreservedly, right off the bat because of the straightforwardness at which people can be supplanted in the event that their LPC score doesn’t match that expected of the circumstance (Pettinger, 2007). Besides, and in particular, is to guarantee that the senior administration are ideally suited to effectively lead the association. Nonetheless, further down the ordered progression Fielder’s possibility hypothesis starts to hold substantially less significance, it becomes unreasonable according to an authoritative viewpoint because of the quantity of individuals at this degree of administration. The operations of coordinating the pioneer with their most un-favored colleague I

This question has been answered.

Get Answer