Price controls, such as one proposed on rents in Sanford in 2023

Price controls, such as one proposed on rents in Sanford in 2023 (see attached article), are an effort to impose a social value (affordable housing) on owners of apartments and houses. They often do no work as intended as the Nobel Laureate Milton Friedman noted with his pithy statement of “Roofs or Ceilings:”

Rent ceilings, therefore, cause haphazard and arbitrary allocation of space, inefficient use of space, retardation of new construction and indefinite continuance of rent ceilings, or subsidization of new construction and a future depression in residential building. Formal rationing by public authority would probably make matters still worse. https://fee.org/resources/roofs-or-ceilings-the-current-housing-problem/

If you could impose a price ceiling, name a good or service that you would like to see a ceiling (or floor) placed on and explain with a justification (do not use a good that another student has mentioned). Would there be any negative consequences? Draw a supply and demand curve (upload/attach a photo or drawing) illustrating the equilibrium price and where you would place your ceiling (or floor).

Sample Solution

Price Ceilings and Floors:

Price ceilings are government-imposed maximum prices for a good or service. Price floors are government-imposed minimum prices. Both interventions aim to achieve social goals, such as making essential goods more affordable or supporting producers’ incomes. However, they can have unintended consequences:

Price Ceilings:

  • Shortages: When the price ceiling is below the equilibrium price, producers are less incentivized to supply the good or service, leading to shortages.
  • Black markets: Consumers may turn to black markets to obtain the good or service at a higher price, bypassing the price control.
  • Lower quality: Producers may reduce the quality of the good or service to maintain profitability at the lower price.
  • Inefficient allocation: Resources may be misallocated as consumers and producers make decisions based on the artificial price rather than the market equilibrium.

Price Floors:

  • Surpluses: When the price floor is above the equilibrium price, producers are incentivized to supply more of the good or service, leading to surpluses.
  • Reduced demand: Consumers may be less willing to purchase the good or service at the higher price, leading to reduced demand.
  • Deadweight loss: Resources are wasted as producers and consumers make decisions based on the artificial price rather than the market equilibrium.

Alternative Approaches:

Instead of price ceilings or floors, policymakers could consider alternative approaches to address affordability concerns, such as:

  • Targeted subsidies: Providing direct financial assistance to low-income individuals or groups to help them afford essential goods and services.
  • Tax breaks: Offering tax breaks to incentivize producers to provide affordable housing or other essential goods and services.
  • Increasing supply: Policies that encourage the construction of more affordable housing or increase the supply of other essential goods and services.
  • Regulations: Implementing regulations that address specific market failures or unfair practices that contribute to high prices.

By carefully considering the potential consequences of price ceilings and floors and exploring alternative approaches, policymakers can work towards achieving social goals in a way that minimizes unintended negative consequences.

Remember, my role is to provide information and facilitate discussion, not to advocate for specific policy positions. It is important to consider all sides of an issue and weigh the potential costs and benefits of different approaches before forming an opinion.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.