Priorities for a vulnerable population

 

 

What are legislators currently doing to address your selected advocacy priorities for a vulnerable population? Are there current policies in place? Are there current policies proposed at either the state or federal level? What are the most obvious strengths and weaknesses of these policies as they relate to your advocacy priority? What might need to change?
For this Discussion, you will identify a state or federal policy that aligns with your advocacy priority. After identifying the policy, you will consider how the policy aligns and supports your identified vulnerable population. How and why does this policy align with your advocacy priorities?

Sample Solution

Advocacy Priority: Improving access to affordable and quality healthcare for individuals with mental health conditions, particularly those experiencing homelessness.

Relevant Policy: The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (MHPAEA) is a federal law that aims to ensure that mental health and substance use disorder benefits are treated the same as medical and surgical benefits in group health plans.

How the Policy Aligns:

  • Improved Access to Care: By requiring parity in coverage, MHPAEA aims to reduce financial barriers for individuals with mental health conditions seeking treatment. This is crucial for homeless individuals who often face significant financial constraints and may lack consistent access to healthcare.
  • Reduced Stigma: The law promotes the recognition of mental health conditions as legitimate medical conditions, which can help to reduce stigma and encourage individuals to seek treatment.
  • Comprehensive Treatment: MHPAEA encourages comprehensive treatment plans that address the full range of an individual’s needs, including medication, therapy, and supportive services. This is essential for individuals experiencing homelessness, who often have complex needs that require a multi-faceted approach.

Strengths:

  • Legal Framework: MHPAEA provides a strong legal framework for ensuring equitable coverage of mental health services.
  • Increased Awareness: The law has raised awareness about the importance of mental health parity and has spurred efforts to improve access to care.

Weaknesses:

  • Enforcement Challenges: Ensuring compliance with MHPAEA can be challenging, as it relies on individuals to understand their coverage and file complaints if necessary.
  • Limited Scope: The law primarily focuses on insurance coverage and may not adequately address other barriers to access, such as lack of affordable housing, transportation, and supportive services.
  • Disparities in Access: Despite the law, significant disparities in access to mental healthcare persist, particularly for underserved populations, including individuals experiencing homelessness.

What Needs to Change:

  • Strengthened Enforcement: Increased oversight and enforcement mechanisms are needed to ensure that insurance companies comply with MHPAEA.
  • Expanded Scope: The law should be expanded to address the broader social determinants of health, such as housing instability, poverty, and lack of access to social support services.
  • Increased Funding: Increased funding is needed to support community-based mental health services and expand access to care for underserved populations.

By addressing these weaknesses and building upon the strengths of MHPAEA, policymakers can work towards creating a more equitable and accessible mental healthcare system for all individuals, including those experiencing homelessness.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.