Grounded theory and ethnography research are useful in qualitative studies in various social science. Grounded theory is a methodical and inductive approach in gathering and analyzing emerging pattern in data. Ethnography is the methodological study of people and cultures which entails the researcher to observe participants from their perspectives. They are both systematic and inductive approaches in exploring cultural phenomenon. However, grounded theory is based on symbolic interaction theory while ethnography is more holistic in nature. Ground theory aims to identify emerging patterns and to conceptualize a theory while ethnography seeks to generate holistic etic and emic insights.
Retribution
This article centers around the job of Roger Chillingworth, one of the heroes of “Red Letter”. Chillingworth was first informed that “White man wearing an unusual jumble of enlightened and savage garments” (“Red letter: 1365 pages”). It keeps on clarifying him as a little elderly person resembling a high IQ and distorted body. Chillingworth has a cool influence in the book. His conduct is practically brutal and you can see that even the name of Chillingworth ought to depict him as a cool heart.
Vengeance, “retribution” is basically identified with a kind of dramatization called “repeating retribution”. The British writer of the Renaissance period made these accounts at the prime of stage retribution. Albeit doubtful of vengeance, these plays hold the picture of brave Avengers, however get him far from retribution itself. In the awfulness of the agnostic ‘s Cyrill competition, the apparition of the killed father showed up on the stage and advised his child not to fight back, as God does it for him. On account of this changeless precept, the potential Avengers fundamentally invest energy in different stupendous woodland scenes, trusting that God will prevail as the principle Avengers.
The awfulness of vengeance (some of the time called retribution show, retribution dramatization or bleeding misfortune) is a sort of hypothesis whose principle subject is the deadly aftereffect of vengeance and vengeance. American instructor Ashley H. Thorndiek formally reported the awfulness of vengeance in the 1902 article “Connection among Hamlet and contemporary retribution dramatization”, recorded the advancement of the hero’s vengeance plan, and regularly killers and Avengers Brought about his own demise. This sort previously showed up in the early present day British distributed by Thomas Kid’s “Misfortune of Spain” in the last 50% of the sixteenth century. Early works, for example, Jasper Heywood ‘s Seneca (1560’ s), Thomas Norton and Thomas Sackville ‘s play Gorbuduc (1561) were additionally viewed as a misfortune of vengeance. Different misfortunes of acclaimed retribution incorporate the awfulness of William Shakespeare’s Hamlet (1599-1602), Titus Andronics (1588-1593), Thomas Middleton’s Avengers (around 1606).
In this investigation of retribution and vengeance of Elizabeth ‘s vengeance, the two plays I see are the “Hamlet” of William Shakespeare and “The Tragedy of Avengers” of Thomas Middleton. After first observing the treatment of the dramatist ‘s Avengers’ character, different characters in the play will deal with the Avengers. Their essential topic is like adhering to the competition, however the two shows present a differentiating picture … Hamlet – a misfortune of vengeance? Shakespeare’s misfortune A puzzling arrangement of contemplations identified with retribution of Hamlet makes this article an intriguing encounter. Ruth Nevo clarifies the vulnerability involved by the hero’s most well known monolog in Acts 3 and 4 in retribution. I can not peruse the talk
