Redesign of business processes

 

 

If you have you been involved with a company doing a redesign of business processes, discuss what went right during the redesign and what went wrong from your perspective. Additionally, provide a discussion on what could have been done better to minimize the risk of failure. If you have not yet been involved with a business process redesign, research a company that has recently completed one and discuss what went wrong, what went right, and how the company could have done a better job minimizing the risk of failure.
Your paper should meet the following requirements:

 

Sample Solution

The term business process redesign refers to a complete overhaul of an organization’s key business processes with the goal of dramatically improving performance indicators such as return on investment (ROI), cost savings, and service quality. increase. Redesignable business processes range from manufacturing and production to sales and customer service. Companies can hire consultants to guide or assist in redesign. The term business process redesign is also known as business process reengineering or business process transformation. Redesign became popular in the 1990s as a way for business leaders to focus on adapting to the changing technologies and other forces of the industry.

There are a few scholars who don’t really line up with Jackson’s viewpoint. David Lewis has the most grounded issue with Jackson’s qualia position. Lewis shapes his issue with Jackson utilizing the Ability Hypothesis and the Hypothesis of Phenomenal Information. Lewis contends that Mary leaves the highly contrasting room, she learns she can realize what seeing red is like. Along these lines, Mary is becoming mindful of capacities, not learning new data. That is, Mary learns the capacity to see red. Lewis utilizes the Hypothesis of Phenomenal Information to contend that the new data Mary gets while review red is indeed remarkable data. Lewis’ point depends on the way that Mary definitely knows “realize that” data, and that the experience instructs her “ability” data, which is wonderful. By learning the “expertise” data, Mary can perceive and recollect red. Assuming that the Ability Hypothesis is valid, Mary acquires the memorable capacity the experience of seeing red. In the wake of encountering red interestingly, you can recall the experience, and accordingly envision the amusement of seeing red. Lewis additionally contends that one more significant capacity acquired is t’he capacity to perceive. Assuming that Mary sees red once more, she will remember it right away. Lewis utilizes the case of Vegemite. Assuming you taste Vegemite sometime in the future, you will recollect (or remember) you have tasted it before. From this, you will actually want to put a name to the taste insight. Lewis likewise contends that these capacities could start from basically anyplace – even wizardry. His central matter is that experience, not illustrations, is the best technique for realizing what another experience is like. Generally, Lewis concurs that information is acquired from encountering red, however accepts the information acquired is “expertise” data, which is extraordinary, and in this manner physicalism is substantial. Lewis contends that data and capacity are different actual familiarities – to this end physicalism can be valid and steady with the end that Mary acquires new information.
It is vital to consider Lewis’ enemy of qualia contention. Albeit the Ability Hypothesis might appear to be enticing to David Lewis, there are a few shortcomings. In the first place, when we are shown a new shading, we a

This question has been answered.

Get Answer