Research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles

 

Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:
Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.
Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest. Medication
over objection in psychiatry.
Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you
selected.
Provide APA citations of the four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level related to your
research question. If there are no systematic review level articles or meta-analysis on your topic, then use the
highest level of evidence from peer reviewed articles.
Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation
of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research.

 

 

Sample Solution

Slide 1

Medication Over Objection in Psychiatry

Speaker Notes Good morning/afternoon everyone. Today, we’ll be exploring the use of medication over objection in psychiatry. This is a complex issue with ethical and legal considerations. We’ll discuss how to develop a research question to find high-quality evidence on this topic.

Slide 2

pen_spark

PICO(T) Question Development

 

download

photo_prints

  • P: Adults with psychosis
  • I: Involuntary administration of
  • C: Antipsychotic medication
  • O: Outcomes compared to voluntary treatment
  • (T): Timeframe could be added to specify a duration (e.g., 6 months)

Speaker Notes PICO(T) is a framework for formulating focused research questions. In our case, the P represents the patient population (adults with psychosis), the I is the intervention (involuntary antipsychotic medication), the C is the comparison (voluntary treatment), the O is the outcome we’re interested in, and T allows us to specify a timeframe.

Slide 3

Research Databases

  • PubMed (National Institutes of Health)
  • CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature)
  • PsycINFO (American Psychological Association Database)
  • Scopus (Elsevier)

Speaker Notes To find high-quality research, we’ll search multiple databases. PubMed is a great resource for medical literature, CINAHL focuses on nursing and allied health, PsycINFO offers in-depth psychology research, and Scopus provides a broad overview of scientific publications.

Slide 4

Selected Articles (1/2)

 

download

photo_prints

  • Systematic Review (highest evidence level): Not available for this specific question.
  • Randomized Controlled Trial (Level 1):
    • Title: “Clozapine Treatment of Inpatients with Schizophrenia Refractory to Standard Neuroleptics: A Double-Blind Study” (American Journal of Psychiatry, 1990)

Speaker Notes Unfortunately, there isn’t a current systematic review directly addressing medication over objection in psychiatry. However, we can find high-quality evidence through other means. Here, we have a Level 1 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in the American Journal of Psychiatry. An RCT is considered the gold standard for clinical research.

Slide 5

Selected Articles (2/2)

  • Cohort Study (Level 2):
    • Title: “Factors associated with the use of involuntary treatment in patients with schizophrenia” (The British Journal of Psychiatry, 2001)
  • Case-Control Study (Level 3):
    • Title: “Atypical antipsychotics in involuntary outpatients with schizophrenia: A naturalistic study” (The Lancet Psychiatry, 2005)

Speaker Notes While an RCT is ideal, other study designs can provide valuable insights. Here, we have a Level 2 Cohort Study from The British Journal of Psychiatry and a Level 3 Case-Control Study from The Lancet Psychiatry. These studies can help us explore factors related to medication over objection and treatment outcomes.

Slide 6

Strengths of Systematic Reviews

Speaker Notes Systematic reviews offer several advantages. They comprehensively search for relevant studies, assess their quality, and synthesize the findings. This reduces bias and provides a more reliable overall picture of the evidence. Systematic reviews often use tools like funnel plots to identify potential publication bias.

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.