Research methods


Imagine you are going to conduct research investigating a human behavior that you would be interested in learning more about.

1. Based on your readings and learning this week describe what research method you would use for investigating it.

2. What drew you to this method? Why would it be well suited for your hypothetical research?

3. What are the strengths and weaknesses of this type of research?

4. When responding to your classmates for the reply posts requirement, take their research topic of interest and recommend a different type of research approach to the study of the topic they chose (Ex: “Another method that might also work is _______” or “Have you thought of the _________ method?” – we want to be respectful and professional and not criticize a classmate’s method choice) and explain why you would recommend that alternative method.

To help jump start this part of the discussion, here is an example of a human behavior that has been researched: Say you were interested in whether men or women approach each other first in social situations where they do not know one another. You might have an opinion based on personal experience, but you want to avoid bias toward one’s own experience and ideas that such might cause, so you are going to conduct a research study. To research this, you might choose “naturalistic observation,” which could require going into nightclubs and taking note of what you observe men and women doing. Another research method would be to give out a survey to see how men and women respond to the question of whether they approach the other. Each method has strengths and weaknesses.

Be sure to check before posting that you have answered all of the questions, that you are basing your statements on concepts you learned about in your weekly readings and activities where required and that your post meets the general posting requirements located under the “View Full Description” link below the main Forum heading.

Sample Solution

In the realm of business, and rather elusively, doublespeak can be barely noticeable on the off chance that you are not focusing or need information on the subject talked about. Along these lines, Lutz exhibits that in 1978, a carrier had the option to allude to a plane accident as an automatic change to self-secure against the extent of the disaster. Here, the doublespeak of language works as verbal shorthand used to disguise as opposed to uncover reality; under comparable conditions, restorative misbehavior can become remedial misfortune (387) and glass incidental bureaucratese, and Lutz features the winding, immense lingo of Federal Chairman, Alan Greenspan (383) for instance to show how language is regularly degraded to overpower a crowd of people and make things darken.

In like way, when words are utilized to pass on an uplifted feeling of significant worth, or when a tangled feeling of power or significance is allocated to someone or something or occasion, they are in real life as expanded language. To put it in an unexpected way, when an organization declares the inception of a vocation elective upgrade program, what it truly implies is that laborers will be laid off; the term for grease monkey is swelled to mean car internist, utilized vehicles recognize as experienced and the U.S. military depicts a planned snare of American soldiers as drawing in the foe on all sides (383). This kind of language reaches out into the scholarly world where doublespeak can likewise be utilized when attempting to portray things that don’t really need to be terrible; that is, it is utilized to just improve reality. Hence, libraries are alluded to as learning asset focuses.

At last, Lutz inclinations an inversion of phonetic rot which, as indicated by him, is a vital advance towards political recovery and language appreciation. Focusing on doublespeak as an issue of goal, he accepts that we ought to have worry about the wantonness of language utilized out in the open talk and energizes educators (or homeroom supervisors) to order a disguise of thankfulness for clea