Research; Quantitative data

Background: Quantitative data can be measured and documented with numbers. Additionally, quantitative data can be represented as quantities. On the other hand, qualitative data is not measured with numbers, but it is represented by qualities. For example, I use quantitative methods to conduct my PhD research because I like working with counts and measures.

Assignment: Write a research paper the contains the following:

Discuss Quantitative Methodology
Discuss Qualitative Methodology
Compare and contrast qualitative data vs quantitative data

A duty framework that treats comparable monetary exercises in comparable manners for charge purposes will in general be more straightforward and maintain a strategic distance from separation among individuals and financial exercises. Anyway it can at times be proficient to separate between various exercises for charge purposes, for example, UK imposes on liquor and tobacco, and different things that mischief others and the earth.


An assessment ought to be attractive with the goal that the administration may shield itself against open analysis, by supporting its practicality. A crooked assessment will consistently confront sharp reluctance with respect to the citizens to pay and they will attempt to dodge them, each new expense must have an avocation to make a sentiment of acknowledgment. Dalton expressed that “in a decent expense framework, there ought to be a twofold hallucination that the rich should pay more than what they might suspect they should, so the rich will be mollified and the poor become ethical and right now, motivation to work and spare will be supported”.

Issues with UK Tax System

The UK needs to change the different frameworks of personal assessment and National Insurance, with various arrangements of rules and exclusions, senselessly expanding organization and consistence expenses and making the framework less straightforward. NI is anything but a genuine social protection conspire any longer; it is simply one more assessment on income, which is added to the absolute income. The present expense and advantage framework is superfluously muddled and persuades numerous individuals not to work or to work close to nothing.

Intelligence requires first that the annual expense framework itself be reasonably organized. We have to move away from trivial complexities, for example, that which any sum somewhere in the range of £100,000 and £123,700 implies the individual recompense decreases and can really imply that a few people would get progressively net gain on the off chance that they earned less.


A decent assessment framework is one which has essentially great duties and satisfies a large portion of the ordinances of tax collection. It ought to be a decent framework where there are a wide range of expenses in the correct extent. The expense and advantage framework should in this way be dynamic, rational, and intended to reflect pay conveyance and how various gatherings react to function motivations. In the present framework, there are a confusion of assessment rates, an absence of a lucid vision of the duty base, and discretionary segregation across various sorts of financial exercises. In any case, annual expense does in a general sense treat the individual proportionately equivalent and gives things all profit by. Eventually, a great expense framework is unquestionably superior to none.