Cybersecurity culture encompasses organizational practices that are aimed at protecting digital assets from external threats. These measures can include employee training on cyber hygiene topics like password security or implementing robust authentication methods when accessing sensitive data just to name a few (Kuhl & Biehl, 2017). Additionally such organizations may also have formal protocols regarding access privileges among staff members with only privileged users being granted permission to certain resources. This helps ensure that confidential information remains secure even if an user’s credentials were compromised. The IRB process is a key component of the ethical framework outlined within the Belmont Report which provides oversight for any research involving humans so they are adequately protected throughout entire experiment. This three-step process consists of initial review where researchers must submit detailed proposals outlining their plans and aims before it can be approved by institutional boards; second stage involves ongoing monitoring -such as making sure participants are aware of all potential risks- while final step includes evaluation upon completion in order assess any changes made during study period (National Commission for Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, 1979). Both cybersecurity culture and the IRB process share common goals in regards to safeguarding those involved from harm but differ in terms how this is accomplished: Cybersecurity centers on preventing malicious actors from accessing confidential data while IRB focuses more on ensuring volunteers know what they are signing up for prior to participating in experiments . Ultimately understanding each one’s importance is essential for creating robust research protocols that prioritize safety without sacrificing accuracy – helping promote trust between organizations and its members more effectively.