Safe and effective transitions of care for older adults
Identify local, state, and national resources which facilitate safe and effective transitions of care for older adults.
Your supervisor at Rasmussen Home Health Services is satisfied with the resources described in your annotated bibliography and is eager for you to continue your work. As a next step, your supervisor wants you to develop and share the following items with them.
Write an introduction about your in-service presentation topic.
Create an outline that identifies and describes the important content areas for your in-service presentation topic.
Sample Solution
Introduction:
The goal of this in-service presentation is to identify and explain various local, state and national resources which facilitate safe and effective transitions of care for older adults. Transitions of care involve the transfer of a patient from one healthcare setting to another--usually happening when someone is discharged from a hospital or transferring between different types of medical facilities (Weaver et al., 2020). It’s important for these processes occur without any disruption due the amount time it may take an individual’s health condition improve. Improper transitions can lead not only physical but also psychological harm so it’s essential that these steps are handled appropriately.
Outline:
I. Introduction
A. Overview
B. Definition/Background Information
II. Local Resources
A. Community Agencies/Organizations
B. Caregiver Support Groups/Programs
III. State Resources
A. Medicaid Programs & Eligibility Requirements
B. Long Term Care Services & Supports
IV National Resources
A Medicare Benefits & Coverage Options B Federal Laws Governing Transition Of Care
V Conclusion.
prevalent of his subjects.' However, he truly does later underscore to place all confidence in the ruler is off-base and has outcomes; a careful assessment of the reason for war is expected alongside the eagerness to arrange rival party (Begby et al (2006b), Page 312& 318). This is upheld by the activities of Hitler are considered unjustifiably. Additionally, in this day and age, wars are not generally battled exclusively by states yet additionally non-state entertainers like Al-Queda and ISIS, showing Vittola's standardizing guarantee on power is obsolete. This is additionally upheld by Frowe's case that the pioneer needs to address individuals' inclinations, under authentic power, which joins on to the fourth condition: Public statement of war. Concurred with many, there should be an authority declaration on a statement of war (Frowe (2011), Page 59-60&63). At long last, the most dubious condition is that wars ought to have a sensible likelihood of coming out on top. As Vittola emphasized, the point of war is to lay out harmony and security; getting the public great. In the event that this can't be accomplished, Frowe contends it would be smarter to give up to the foe. This can be legitimate on the grounds that the expenses of war would have been greater (Frowe (2011), Page 56-7). Subsequently, jus promotion bellum contains a few circumstances however in particular: noble motivation and proportionality. This gives individuals an aide regardless of whether entering a war is legal. Be that as it may, this is just a single piece of the hypothesis of the simply war. By the by, it very well may be seen over that jus promotion bellum can be bantered all through, showing that there is no conclusive hypothesis of a simply battle, as it is normatively guessed.
Jus in bello
The subsequent segment starts translating jus in bello or what activities might we at any point group as admissible in wars (Begby et al (2006b), Page 323). In the first place, it is never to kill blameless individuals in wars, upheld by Vittola's most memorable recommendation purposefully. This is generally acknowledged as 'all individuals have a right not to be killed' and in the event that a trooper does, they have disregarded that right and lost their right. This is additionally upheld by "non-warrior resistance" (Frowe (2011), Page 151), which prompts the subject of soldier capability referenced later in the article. This is confirmed by the besieging of Nagasaki and Hiroshima, finishing the Second World War, where millions were eagerly killed, just to get the point of war. Be that as it may, here and there regular citizens are incidentally killed through battles to accomplish their objective of harmony and security. This is upheld by Vittola, who infers proportionality again to legitimize activity: 'care should be taken where evil doesn't offset the potential advantages (Begby et al (2006b), Page 325).' This is additionally upheld by Frowe who makes sense of it is legitimate to unexpectedly kill, at whatever point the soldier has full information on his activities and looks to finish his point, yet it would include some significant pitfalls. Nonetheless, this doesn't conceal the reality the accidental actually killed blameless individuals, showing shamelessness in their activities