Setting Boundaries When Working With Clients

at
Categories
Tags

 

Prior to beginning work on this week’s discussion, please review Standard 3: Human Relations Links to an external site.in the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Please also read the Asay and Lal (2014) “Who’s Googled Whom? Trainees’ Internet and Online Social Networking Experiences, Behaviors, and Attitudes with Clients and Supervisors,” Harris and Robinson Kurpius (2014) “Social Networking and Professional Ethics: Client Searches, Informed Consent, and Disclosure,” and Taylor, McMinn, Bufford, and Chang (2010) “Psychologists’ Attitudes and Ethical Concerns Regarding the Use of Social Networking Web Sites” articles.

For this discussion, you will examine ethical issues encountered by clinical and counseling psychologists in the digital age. Begin by reviewing the cases of Dr. Arnold and Dr. Washington listed below and selecting one of these ethical dilemmas for analysis.

Case 1
Dr. Arnold is a clinical psychologist who specializes in child and adolescent issues. From time to time, she provides consultation on high lethality cases within the juvenile court system. Recently, she was referred a case involving a 15-year-old male who has a history of aggression, angry outburst, destructive behavior, and cyberstalking. Concerned for her safety and well-being, Dr. Arnold input the client’s name into a search engine, which yielded the client’s social network page. Dr. Arnold is uncertain whether or not to look at the client’s social network page.

Case 2
Dr. Washington is a counseling psychologist who specializes in trauma and self-harming behavior. Recently, he received a “friend request” from a former client who he provided individual therapy to six months ago. Dr. Washington opted not to accept the “friend request,” but considered sending a private message to the client with the social networking policy from his informed consent. Dr. Washington is uncertain whether or not to send the private message to the client.

In your initial post, assume the role of a colleague to the doctor named and analyze the ethical issues encountered in your chosen case. Given the situation described in the case study, recommend how your colleague should proceed. Provide support for your response by citing the required articles for this discussion. Consider the current and potential actions of your colleague and explain whether or not he or she is currently, or potentially will be, in violation of the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Provide support for your explanation by citing Standard 3: Human Relations Links to an external site.in the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Explain how your colleague might avoid this type of ethical dilemma in the future. Describe what policy or policies you might put in place if you were your colleague.

 

Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (apa.org)

 

Sample Solution

this structure, first, he looks into a mental meltdown from a psychological instability. He gives the case of how “a mental meltdown as an episode seen by the lay public as a temporary problem that nearly anybody could insight assuming they were exposed to an unnecessary degree of stress”(Gove). This stands interestingly, with somebody who is marked with a psychological problem “the lay public will in general accept that people who are ‘deranged’ are messy, unusual, flighty, and hazardous (Gove). These bothersome relationship with the determinations of a psychological issue, frequently make marked individuals feel demonized and generalized for their psychological problems. The trashing can provide marked individuals with a feeling of anomie and apprehension about friendly dismissal.

As per “changed naming hypothesis,” the social and cultural generalizations that encompass psychological instability, are seen as taking steps to “marked individuals,” or the people who have been determined to have a psychological issue. They dread “cheapening or dismissal by the ‘normals” in our general public (Thoits). To deal with these recently seen dangers, named individuals frequently utilize different survival techniques. A portion of these systems are accepted to adversely affect the named individual, like mystery, withdrawal, and evasion from society. Different methodologies can work on the marked individuals’ personal satisfaction. As indicated by Thoits, the most usually examined survival strategy that valuably affects the marked individual, is testing or going up against the marks of disgrace that encompass the named individual’s analysis. Thoits states, “testing [the labelization] advances confidence, lower burdensome side effects, better personal satisfaction, and a feeling of strengthening, which are all viewed as key results in the recuperation writing ” (Thoits). While recognizing that these c

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.
Hi, how can I help?