The topic is: "Shock therapy reforms do not result in better economic and social outcomes compared to gradual reforms"
-explain the nature of the issue
-cover the two or three most important arguments in favor of the position you are taking
(therefore you need to go beyond the points that you personally made in the oral debate)
-explain the most important objections to the position you are supporting, and respond to
these objections, using evidence and sources.
You must cite literature to support your points. You should cite at least two ACADEMIC sources.
Each position paper will be evaluated individually based on the clarity of your writing, coverage
of important points, the strength of your arguments and evidence, and the extent to which you
took account of opposing viewpoints.