In business, sports, politics, and many other fields there are probably countless situations akin to the prisoner’s dilemma where players acting in their own self-interest do not produce an ideal outcome. Likewise, some player dynamics also illustrate other game theory concepts like a game of chicken, credible threats/commitments, and other similar concepts. Use at least one article from The Wall Street Journal to discuss a strategic situation between players that resembled or used any of the concepts above. What could have any of the players done differently to achieve a better outcome?
The Airline Price War: A Prisoner’s Dilemma Takes Flight ()
The airline industry is a prime example of situations resembling the prisoner’s dilemma. A recent Wall Street Journal article titled “The Airline Price War That Wasn’t” (June 20, 2023) details how major airlines avoided a price war despite the temptation to undercut competitors.
Prisoner’s Dilemma in Action:
Imagine two airlines, Airline A and Airline B, in a market. They can either set high prices (Cooperate) or start a price war with low fares (Defect).
This situation mirrors the prisoner’s dilemma. Individually, it might be tempting for an airline to cut prices and gain a temporary edge. However, if both airlines engage in a price war, everyone loses profit.
Avoiding the Race to the Bottom:
The article highlights how airlines, aware of the prisoner’s dilemma, took steps to avoid a price war:
What Could Airlines Do Differently?
While the airlines successfully avoided a price war, there’s always room for improvement:
By continuing to cooperate and innovate, airlines can achieve a more sustainable and profitable future, avoiding the pitfalls of the prisoner’s dilemma.