Based on course reading and individual research, what does a school leader (e.g. principal) need to know about Teachers’ Rights of Expression, Association and Privacy? Pay close attention to the issues involved: recent trends, controversies, new developments and circumstances in Washington state.
School leaders, such as principals, need to be aware of the rights of expression, association and privacy that are afforded to teachers by state and federal laws. This includes understanding their right to free speech under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (Kualapai Unified School District v. Hawkins, 2021), as well as their right to form associations at work or join labor unions without fear of retaliation (National Labor Relations Act of 1935). Additionally, school leaders must recognize teachers’ right to privacy in regards to data collection and protection from unnecessary monitoring or surveillance (Student Privacy Protection Act 2019).
In Washington State specifically, recent trends have seen increased efforts being made towards protecting teacher’s rights both in terms of how they express themselves in the workplace as well as when it comes to having access to student data for instructional purposes only (Washington Education Association 2020). Controversies surrounding issues like these primarily center around balancing teacher autonomy with maintaining a safe educational environment for students; especially since new technologies and social media can blur what is considered appropriate boundary crossing between personal and professional communication in today’s digital age (Gutierrez et al., 2019). More recently however schools have begun exploring ways on how best utilize online communication platforms responsibly while preventing inappropriate conduct so that it does not distract from learning objectives or create hostile environments for anyone involved (AAPL-Atwood & Kirchner 2020).
Overall, there are many aspects school leaders need to consider when it comes managing teachers’ rights related issues. However, by staying informed about current legal developments and adopting policies which promote responsible use of technology while also providing clear expectations regarding professional boundaries; they can help ensure all members within their school community feel respected while still creating an environment conducive towards learning.
Thusly the discoveries of this report can presume that, while expressions training was fairly elitist beforehand, the presentation of the Ebacc in 2010 made expressions schooling more elitist.
More noteworthy exertion should be made to guarantee that artistic expressions training, that is progressively restricted to the ‘first class’ in the public eye, is made accessible to all. Mediation at an instructive level is important to make a school system that gives all understudies fair and significant training in the craftsmanship branches of knowledge. There is an overall agreement that “Without instructive mediation we are at risk for permitting a two-level framework wherein the most advantaged in friendly and monetary terms are likewise the most advantaged in benefiting financially, socially and by and by from the full scope of social and imaginative encounters” (Warwick Commission Report, 2015).
Ways of guaranteeing that expressions schooling isn’t held for the most financially special in the public eye incorporate the presentation of a new and updated English Baccalaureate. As expressed in the Warwick Commission Report, Improving England: Culture, Imagination and Development (2015), “There is an overall understanding inside the Social and Imaginative Enterprises and industry all the more extensively that the Public authority’s emphasis on Science, Innovation, Designing and Maths (STEM) ought to incorporate Artistic expression (STEAM)”. This overhauled English Baccalaureate, would prompt giving more noteworthy chances to schools and understudies to encounter a decent expressions instruction, while permitting the Ebacc to satisfy its actual aim of “keep[ing] youngsters’ choices open for additional review and future professions” (Division for Training, 2010). The public authority likewise has an obligation to direct confidential foundations, and monetarily support understudies that go to them, in a work guarantee HE and FE offers similar open doors for every single youngster, paying little mind to pay. Government have an obligation, on both a public and nearby level, to make expressions schooling less elitist beyond the ‘customary’ instructive settings; giving chances to less advantaged youngsters to encounter craftsmanship training in a social setti