Sample Solution
The effectiveness of any clinical team is largely dependent on the individual members and their ability to work in harmony with one another. However, there are certain characteristics across teams which tend to make them effective or ineffective in terms of achieving expected outcomes for patients.
Firstly, it is important for all team members to have a clear understanding of their roles within the team as well as a shared vision and goal they are striving towards (Farrell et al., 2020). Without this structure the team may struggle to stay focused and drift away from the task at hand. In addition communication must be open between all members so that ideas can be exchanged freely without fear of judgement or criticism and everyone feels comfortable voicing their opinions (Kelleher & Hogan 2017). Another factor which helps ensure an effective outcome is trust between each member so that disagreements can occur without worrying about hurting someone’s feelings or damaging relationships (Johnson & Johnson 2009). All these aspects help create an atmosphere where higher quality care can be provided for patients due to increased collaboration between each member.
Conversely, when any one these components are absent from a clinical team then it could lead to an ineffective result overall. For example, if there exists no shared vision among members then decisions might lack consistency while communication breakdowns could cause delays in treatment plans leading to more harm than good being done for patients.
In conclusion, successful teams require balance between several different factors including trust, communication and clearly defined goals. When present each component strengthens the other allowing outcomes achieved by the group as whole exceed what could have been done alone.
018). Hong Kong is a piece of China, yet the main things the Chinese government controls in Hong Kong is unfamiliar relations and the military. The populace filled in Hong Kong from 600, 000 to 6 million of every fifty years (Friedman, 1998). This populace development was because of individuals escaping from the socialist province of China to Hong Kong. A significant disadvantage to decreased monetary opportunities, is the diminished political opportunity that ordinarily accompanies it. The two issues have progressively reduced in China since the level of their socialist rule. It’s obvious that individuals favor opportunity over control from the way that individuals escaped from their controlling to country, to a free country.
Friedman has said that Hong Kong has a Free enterprise economy since government financial spending in Hong Kong is all things considered 15% of the public pay (1998). Free enterprise is French for “let it do”. Comparable to financial aspects, Free enterprise alludes to negligible obstruction in financial matters by states. Hong Kong is exceptionally near having a free enterprise economy, which has its advantages. Hong Kong is tiny in size, and subsequently has not many regular assets; regardless of this, Hong Kong’s economy is blasting. Its GDP, Gross domestic product, per capita is the seventeenth most elevated on the planet, at $61, 400 (The World Factbook, 2017). A high Gross domestic product per capita demonstrates an elevated expectation of living since there is a lot of financial result per individual. The higher the Gross domestic product per capita is, the more probable it is that general society is happy with their country, which in this way prompts a lower probability of political uprisings.
Not at all like Marx’s hypothesis that free enterprise is just a phase that is toppled by individuals who search out socialism after their disappointment with private enterprise, the Soviet Association was broken down since individuals were discontent with the socialist framework. The non-serious nature of socialism has negative ramifications on all levels. The average realizes they are ensured similar advantages paying little heed to how much work they’re doing, and the way that well they’re getting it done. The space for financial development is insignificant. At a more significant level, there is no rivalry between firms, which causes a stagnation. No monetary development prompts misery, which prompts political kickback, and insurgencies.
Free enterprise brings about financial development since it takes care of advancement through contest. China has fostered an undeniably unregulated economy. The Soviet Association was creative at whatever point they were engaged with rivaling the US, however for items just circulated inside their country, it was dependably
Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.