Tennessee v. Garner
Satisfactory completion of individual case brief summaries will require the following:
1.Title of case: Tennessee v. Garner
2. Briefly summarize the origins of the case. How did this case come to light? What path resulted in the case being heard at the highest levels?
3. What is the legal “issue” under examination?
4. What is the court’s holding/ruling/decision?
5. Discuss both majority and dissenting opinions (if applicable).
6. How has this case impacted the criminal justice system/law enforcement
Sample Solution
If a criminal suspect escapes or forcibly resists arrest after a police officer has given notice of intent to arrest him, Tennessee law states that "the officer may use any necessary means to make the arrest." A Memphis police officer, acting under the authority of this legislation, shot and killed appellee-respondent Garner's son after he fled over a fence in the rear of a property he was suspected of burglarizing after being warned to stop. Despite being "fairly certain" that the subject was unarmed and that he was 17 or 18 years old and of little stature, the officer used fatal force.
other settings and people; therefore, it is a procedure that is effective (Hart and Risley, 1975). Training in settings that are natural, increases the amount of instruction that can be provided to autistic children (McGee, Krantz, Mason, & McClannahan, 1983). Incidental teaching has an appropriate blend of systematic instruction and normalized environment for the child to learn (McGee, Morrier, & Daly, 1999). In addition, the procedure encourages children to make their own choices and aids social initiation since the initiations are being rewarded (McGee et al., 1999).