The absolute advantage

 

 

In Japan, one worker can make 5 tons of rubber or 80 radios. In Malaysia, one worker can make 10 tons of rubber or 40 radios.
a. Who has the absolute advantage in the production of rubber or radios? How can you tell?
b. Calculate the opportunity cost of producing 80 additional radios in Japan and in Malaysia. (Your calculation may involve fractions, which is fine.) Which country has a comparative advantage in the production of radios?
c. Calculate the opportunity cost of producing 10 additional tons of rubber in Japan and in Malaysia. Which country has a comparative advantage in producing rubber?
d. In this example, does each country have an absolute advantage and a comparative advantage in the same good?
e. In what product should Japan specialize? In what product should Malaysia specialize

 

 

Sample Solution

Absolute advantage is the ability of an individual, company, region, or country to produce a greater quantity of a good or service with the same quantity of inputs per unit of time, or to produce the same quantity of a good or service per unit of time using a lesser quantity of inputs, than its competitors. The concept of absolute advantage was developed by 18th century economist Adam Smith in his book The Wealth of Nations to show how countries can gain from trade by specializing in producing and exporting the goods that they can produce more efficiently than other countries. Countries with an absolute advantage can decide to specialize in producing and selling a specific good or service and use the generated funds to purchase goods and services from other countries.

Net Profit Margin, Operating Profit Margin, and Net Profit Margin

 

Net benefit expanded 103.69% in 2016 contrasted with 2015 (Figure 3 above). This can be credited principally to the expansion in income as referenced above, and decreasing expenses. ‘The organization revealed 8.41% expense flattening in 2016, driven by a more vulnerable PESO contrasted with the dollar, and lower diesel and power expenses’ (Sam Williams, 2017). Peso dropped 17% contrasted with $US in 2016 (Ivana Kottasova, 2016), and with 67% of Fresnillo’s expenses being peso based, the organization profited from this fall in money (Proactiveinvestors, 2016). In 2016, Mexico’s gold mining area likewise saw a fall in normal money expenses of 5.4%, with Fresnillo recording the most minimal expense gold activity at its Cienega mine where money costs were $-217 for every ounce down from $245 per ounce in 2015 (Sam Williams, 2017). Notwithstanding their productivity in 2017, development in Fresnillo overall revenues is decreasing (Figure 3). Net benefit expanded simply by 4.91%, because of inflating costs. Cost of deals expanded 14.1% from 2016 contrasted with just a 1.2% expansion 2015 – 2016. 2017 saw an expansion in cost for each huge amount of 29.3% which was mostly because of lower volumes of metal being handled, energy cost likewise expanded 22.3%, from $118 million of every 2016 to $144 million in 2017(Fresnillo, 2017 pp. 56, 210). This increment could be credited to some degree to an expansion in base power levies, by Mexico’s state power utility (CFE), which kept an expansion in base power costs on a year on year premise of 14.3% in 2017 (Daniel Rodriguez, 2017). Fresnillo additionally encountered an expansion in compensation on normal of 5.8% (Alex Newman, 2018)

 

Working benefits likewise expanded 237.49% in 2016 (Figure 3) because of falling costs. The fall in working costs could be ascribed to; degrading of the Mexican peso, decline in non-repeating designing and development administrations given by Servicios Industriales Peñoles, S.A.B. de C.V., which diminished regulatory costs by 5.8%, and a 13.6% fall in investigation costs, because of the executives’ choice to lessen consumption in unpredictable economic situations (Fresnillo, 2016 p. 108). In 2017 working benefits are developing at a reduced pace of 4.86% contrasted with 2016. As per Octavio Alvidrez the CEO, there was a heightening of investigation exercises around mining regions (Marcus Leroux, 2017), this could represent the 16.4% increment in investigation costs to $141 million from $121 million out of 2016. Further costs were brought about as Fresnillo started penetrating at the Juanicipio project, in a joint effort with the investigation group from MAG Silver corp. This added to diminish development in Fresnillo’s working edge.

 

Net benefits were at a low of 4.8% in 2015, however with a huge lift underway result and income development, this edge expanded by an astonishing 512% in 2016, notwithstanding charge cost expanding 105%. This pattern go on in 2017 with the edge expanding 31.97%, as duty costs dropped 38.39%. The fall in charge cost was somewhat because of the derivation of inflationary elevates of the duty base of resources and liabilities (Fresnillo, 2017). In 2017, Fresnillo’s net and working net revenues have both dropped somewhat, to 44.21% and 33.88% separately though the net revenue has expanded to 26.79% (figure: 2 above). Notwithstanding the 38.39% fall in charge cost, this increment can likewise be credited to the 4.5% spot revaluation of the Mexican peso against the US dollar that brought about a

This question has been answered.

Get Answer