The characteristics of Software as a Service (SaaS)

 

 

Describe the characteristics of Software as a Service (SaaS), platform as a service (PaaS), and infrastructure as a service (IaaS). Explain the differences between these services by providing examples.

 

Sample Solution

Software as a Service (SaaS), also known as cloud application services, represents the most commonly utilized option for businesses in the cloud market. SaaS utilizes the internet to deliver applications, which are managed by a third-party vendor, to its users. Platform as a Service (PaaS), also known as cloud platform services, provide cloud components to certain software while being used mainly for applications. Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) is fully self-service for accessing and monitoring computers, networking, storage, and other services. IaaS gives access to the resources like virtual machines and virtual storage. PaaS gives access to run time environment to deployment and development tools for application. SaaS gives access to the end user. It is a service model that provides virtualized computing resources over the internet.

Instructional method alludes to the “cooperations between instructors, understudies, and the learning climate and the learning assignments” (Murphy, 2008 p. 35). In layman’s terms, instructional method basically implies the strategy and method of how educators educate, in principle and practically speaking. With regards to e-learning, VLEs don’t seem to help a specific instructive methodology (McAvinia, 2016). Notwithstanding, as indicated by McAvinia (2016), the innovator of Moodle states that Moodle utilizes an expressly friendly constructivist instructional method. The constructivist teaching method is named a student focused or understudy focused instructive methodology wherein information is built by students through a functioning, mental course of improvement, and students are the developers and makers of importance and information (Ozola, 2012).

Some examination recommends that while the understudy focused approach, which embodies constructivism, can be extremely viable to understudies’ learning and scholastic execution, it is still commonly challenging to quantify reliably (Westbrook et al., 2013). This is on the grounds that there are not many appraisal instruments assessing this particular instructive methodology, and essentially no evaluation devices for constructivist-type VLEs. The said not many appraisal apparatuses accessible are additionally moderately new, so not much extensive examination has been finished to test its unwavering quality and consistency. One such appraisal apparatus explicitly made to quantify the understudy focused instructive methodology, barring constructivist-type VLEs, is the as of late evolved Estimating and Further developing Understudy Focused Learning (MISCL) Tool compartment (Kaufman et al, 2020).

As indicated by the exploration report wrote by Kaufman et al. (2020), the MISCL Tool compartment is not difficult to utilize and creates precise, significant outcomes. Furthermore, the toolbox clients or members in this starter investigation discovered that the MISCL Tool stash process is reasonable and helpful (Kaufman et al, 2020). Notwithstanding, since the appraisal device is moderately new and one of only a handful of exceptional that explicitly gauges understudy focused learning on the lookout, Kaufman et al. (2020) surrender that really testing in schools with a wide range of understudy focused learning qualities and encounters is required. In light of this proposal, utilizing the MISCL Tool compartment to test the adequacy of Moodle VLE is additionally sensible and vital to give decisive proof on how predictable the aftereffects of the MISCL Tool compartment are.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer