Michelle needed money to pay her rent. She is behind 3 months in rent and fears being evicted. She decides to rob Capital One Bank. Michelle asks her roommate Cheryl to help her. They agree to split the money 60% Michelle and 40% for Cheryl. This was based on the fact that Cheryl was going to only purchase the items necessary to commit the crime, like the gun and ski mask, and agreed to be the lookout at the bank. Cheryl purchased a gun and ski mask early in the week. Midweek, she stopped into the local pub for a few drinks. She began telling the bartender about her plan to get money. The bartender said nothing. Later that week, before the robbery was to take place, Michelle and Cheryl went to get their nails done. While at the nail salon, they were arrested. As the prosecutor, with what crimes can you charge Michelle and Cheryl? Do their actions constitute the crime of attempt? Discuss why or why not. Use legal reasoning to support your response.
As the prosecutor, I would charge Michelle and Cheryl with two crimes: conspiracy to commit robbery and attempted robbery.
The bartender’s actions are not relevant to the charges against Michelle and Cheryl. The bartender did not participate in the robbery, and they did not have any knowledge of the robbery before it was stopped. Therefore, the bartender cannot be charged with any crime.
Michelle and Cheryl’s actions do constitute the crime of attempt. An attempt occurs when someone takes a substantial step towards committing a crime, but the crime is not completed. In this case, Michelle and Cheryl purchased a gun and ski mask, and they went to get their nails done before the robbery was to take place. These actions can be considered substantial steps towards committing the robbery, so they can be charged with attempted robbery.
The legal reasoning to support this conclusion is as follows: