“ The Economic Risks of Being a Housewife”

1. Write at least a 2-page paper addressing the issue of housewife and homemaker compensation.
2. Can not use Wikipedia as a source but use credible sources such as:
O-Net and the article “ The Economic Risks of Being a Housewife”, by Barbara R.Bergmann( AEA Papers and Proceedings , Volume 71, No.2, May 1981) You can find the article on google search.
3. Paper should address issues of compensation, and should be well informed from the perspectives of job analysis, job evaluation, economic, labor force, and occupational profile.
4. You may include personnel decision making if you see fit, but don’t go too far afield addressing how you would select and retain a housewife and homemaker.
5. You have your own theories; keep them to yourself for now unless they are immediately material and relevant to the issue of compensation.

Sample Solution

The role of the housewife and homemaker has been traditionally undervalued in society. These women often work long hours without pay, and their contributions to the household and economy are often overlooked. In recent years, there has been a growing movement to advocate for housewife and homemaker compensation.

Arguments for Compensation

There are a number of arguments in favor of housewife and homemaker compensation. First, these women often work long hours. According to a 2017 study by the Pew Research Center, the average housewife or homemaker works 96 hours per week. This includes both paid and unpaid work. Second, these women’s contributions to the household and economy are often overlooked. Housewife and homemakers provide essential services, such as cooking, cleaning, childcare, and eldercare. These services save families money and contribute to the economy. Third, housewife and homemaker compensation would help to close the gender pay gap. Women are still paid less than men for doing the same work. Compensation for housewife and homemakers would help to level the playing field.

Arguments Against Compensation

There are also a number of arguments against housewife and homemaker compensation. First, some people argue that it would be unfair to compensate housewives and homemakers for work that they would be doing anyway. They argue that these women would be compensated for doing something that they would be doing for free. Second, some people argue that it would be difficult to quantify the value of housewife and homemaker work. It would be difficult to determine how much these women should be paid for their work. Third, some people argue that housewife and homemaker compensation would discourage women from entering the workforce. They argue that women would be more likely to stay at home if they were guaranteed a salary for doing so.

Conclusion

The issue of housewife and homemaker compensation is a complex one. There are strong arguments on both sides of the issue. Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to compensate housewives and homemakers is a political one. However, the growing movement to advocate for housewife and homemaker compensation is a sign that this issue is gaining attention.

Sources

  • **O*NET OnLine: Homemaker
  • The Value of Housework by Nancy Folbre
  • The Case for Compensating Housework by Joan Williams
  • The Pros and Cons of Compensating Housework by The Atlantic

Additional Information

  • The National Domestic Workers Alliance is a non-profit organization that advocates for the rights of domestic workers, including housewives and homemakers.
  • The Family Care Alliance is a non-profit organization that provides support and resources to families who rely on home care.
  • The National Organization for Women is a non-profit organization that advocates for the rights of women, including the right to equal pay.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.