THE GLASS MENAGERIE, by Tennessee Williams, 1944

 

 

 

Describe Tom’s aspirations and dilemmas. How does he initially try to reconcile the conflicting demands of his dreams and his sense of responsibility to his family? What does he decide to do at the end of the play? Is he successful in his final attempt at escaping from his family? What significant symbols does the author use to illustrate Tom’s struggle?

 

 

 

 

Sample Solution

The Glass Menagerie is a memory play by Tennessee Williams that premiered in 1944 and catapulted Williams from obscurity to fame. Tom Wingfield was the potentially creative character caught in a conventional and materialistic world. He was the free spirit who had to curb his wings by working at a dreaded and disliked job in a shoe warehouse. His motivation appears to change throughout the play. At times he acts out of his feelings of love and responsibility to his family while at other times he is driven by his sense of adventure. Tom`s rejection of his family was not a selfish, egocentric escape. Instead, Tom recognized that he must escape in order to save himself. It was a means of self-preservation. He knew if he stayed, he would be destroyed as a man and as an artist.

Hamlet and Revenge

Hamlet and retribution of vengeance have made numerous individuals breakdown. The idea of its utilization drives individuals to act deceitfully through annoyance as opposed to reason. Vengeance is simple sensible feeling; one turn merits another round. In any case, this is a risky hypothesis. Vengeance is the primary topic in Hamlet. Fortinbras, Laertes, and Hamlet are looking for vengeance for their dad’s demise. In any case, thusly, every one of the three individuals rely upon feeling as opposed to suspecting and make an extremely large wager.

Hamlet and retribution are hopeless organizations attempting vengeance and those looking for retribution (Hamlet) inevitably face demise after the wrongdoing. History of misfortune of retribution Prosser’s view on Hamlet’s vengeance “Saints are asked to fight back, as most misfortunes of retaliation, casualties or wrongdoings are legitimately identified with the hero” (Prosser) of retribution The impacts of misfortune incorporate Julius Caesar, Macbeth and Andronis. In Shakespeare ‘s paper by Shakespeare, Shakespeare centers around vengeance and builds up the idea of death in the play. What is the awfulness of the retribution of the Elizabethan time? This is a misfortune, its thought process is vengeance, and its fundamental plot incorporates the procedure of counter. The awfulness of retribution in the long run prompted the passing of the killer and the Avengers himself. In misfortune of vengeance, we need three letters.

Shakespeare’s “Hamlet” shows the overall components found in the awfulness of the vengeance of the renaissance (“misfortune of retribution”). Be that as it may, despite the fact that Hamlet is a misfortune of retribution, Shakespeare convolutes the fundamental vengeance plot by making three retribution plots. By including significant developments, Shakespeare makes ‘Ship of the Concentric Revenge Miwa’ (Frye 90) which is certainly not a physical legend yet an apparition, not a phantom, yet a scholarly saint who is an issue. did. viewpoint

In Shakespeare’s ‘Hamlet’ retribution, Shakespeare vindicated as the subject of the considerable number of works. Retribution assumes a significant job in the improvement of Fortinbras, Prince of Norway, Hamlet, the Prince of Denmark, and the child of Polonius Laertes. Each of the three requested vengeance for their dad’s homicide. In Hamlet, vengeance can be deciphered as another character. Everybody looking for vengeance will defeat it. To begin with, after each murder every child has a reasonable activity plan.

 

 

 

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer