The Gunpowder Empires

Artifacts from the Gunpowder Empires (Safavid, Ottoman, and Mughal) demonstrate a great convergence of peoples, economies, and cultures during the fifteenth through the eighteenth centuries. Empowered by new military technologies, these mighty empires spread over large swaths of territory, drawing together disparate groups and traditions. In this assignment, you will view artifacts from this time of convergence, and search for themes and patterns common to this historical period. complete the worksheet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqHVRgCkCDE&feature=youtu.be
https://youtu.be/hNpcQEGw3S4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNpcQEGw3S4&feature=youtu.be

Sample Answer

The History of Gunpowder could easily be argued as one of the most important inventions or discoveries in the ancient history. And there are many things that can be argued about gunpowder itself. Such as where was it originated, when was it originated, and how did it spread across the world. That said, this paper will discuss the thematic concerns and patterns that were portrayed through the artifacts to this point in history as will be seen in the discussion of this paper.

In the Federalist Papers, Number Seventy, distributed March Fifteenth, 1788, Alexander Hamilton stated, "A weak Executive infers a weak execution of the legislature. A weak execution is nevertheless another expression for a terrible execution; and an administration poorly executed, whatever it might be in principle, must be, practically speaking, an awful government." He contended that a solitary official, rather than an official gathering, would be an obviously better decision. He realized that it would be the most ideal approach.

At the point when Hamilton composed the federalist paper number seventy, America had quite recently split away from the English government and was framing how the administration was to be organized. At the point when he said a weak official, he implied a president who didn't have a lot of intensity and needed to impart capacity to an official board. He felt that a gathering of more than one official would prompt a more fragile government.

Hamilton had faith in the vitality of the official, a vigorous particular pioneer. He trusted it was fundamental to the network and remote assaults. He didn't need the ability to be weakened among many. He said this would deny individuals of two protections. One being the restriction of general sentiment: who do you consider responsible if there is more than one individual in control and one of the people accomplishes something incorrectly? On the off chance that there is more than one individual in the workplace and something turns out badly, individuals could point fingers on one another. On another hand, if there is one president we realize who to fault, and can expel that individual from office.

He likewise believed that mystery in one individual official was satisfactory, particularly in the midst of war. In spite of the fact that antiquarians, for example, Arthur Schlesinger Jr. thought much in an unexpected way. He accepted that this sort of official mystery would at last lead to the ability to retain, spill, and the ability to lie. A case of this is the manner by which Eisenhower concealed CIA activities. "The ability to retain and the ability to spill drove on relentlessly to the ability to lie. The mystery framework ingrained in the official branch the possibility that international strategy was nobody's the same old thing, spare its own, and the uncontrolled mystery made it simple for misleading become schedule. It was in this soul that Eisenhower hid the CIA tasks it was mounting against governments around the globe." (Khan Academy)

In spite of the fact that Hamilton had the correct thought for having a solitary official as president, we can see that our ancestors were insightful enough to incorporate the Legislative and Judicial Branches to check and adjust their official. One case of this is the twenty-second revision, which takes into account close to two terms, four years each in an administration. President Franklin Delanor Roosevelt served four terms during the extraordinary sadness. As a response, on March Twenty-Fourth, 1947, Congress changed the Constitution. A subsequent model is the War Powers Act of 1973, in which Congress and the Legislative Branch casted a ballot and pondered that a president couldn't submit the United States to war without the assent of the U.S. Congress.

In the Federalist Papers, Number Seventy, Alexander Hamilton contends having a solitary official as our leader is fundamental for a flourishing republic. This president is a lively power whose extreme astuteness will lead the country while tolerating the exhortation, advice, and analysis of different branches. The Legislative and Judicial Branches serve to check and adjust this person as not to enable that person to have complete maltreatment of intensity.