The hysteria around the Salem witch trials from 1692-1693.

at
Categories
Tags

 

 

 

 

 

Compare and contrast 2 or more different explanations for the hysteria around the Salem witch trials from 1692-1693. Some theories to contrast are ergot poisoning and folk magic and a few others if possible/needed for length. Two of the secondary sources I need to use are: https://www.neh.gov/article/records-salem-witch-trials, and https://www.history.com/topics/colonial-america/salem-witch-trials

 

Sample Solution

The Salem witch trials of 1692-1693 became infamous for the large scale hysteria that resulted in a number of people being wrongfully convicted and even executed. Since then, multiple explanations have emerged attempting to explain the underlying causes of this phenomenon. In this essay, I will compare and contrast two such explanations – ergot poisoning and folk magic – in order to gain a better understanding of why it happened.

Ergot poisoning is thought to be one possible explanation as it was found that around the same time as the trials some crops had become contaminated by ergot fungi which can cause hallucinations if ingested (NEH 2018). This could account for why many accused reported seeing visions or other supernatural events taking place. However, while this theory explains those who were accused, it does not necessarily provide an answer as to why so many people participated in actively accusing others of witchcraft (History 2020). Furthermore research has shown that although there may have been some cases of contamination most likely did not reach levels where would be sufficient enough to induce any kind hallucinations .

In contrast, another potential explanation looks at how superstition and beliefs related folk magic played out during this period . During these times particularly colonial New England , belief systems encompassing witches , demons , possessions providing reasonable framework susceptible individuals . For example use certain herbs incantations could allegedly achieve desired results which lead tendency blame those actions on suspects rather than accepting them simply accidents (History 2020). This could account for why accusations spread quickly throughout community without any real evidence take place under current legal system .
To sum up , both ergot poisoning and folk magic offer plausible explanations behind occurrence Salem Witch Trials however each approach also leaves gaps its own reasoning . Erget Poisoning helps explain cause behavior among those who were accused but doesn’t account active participants while Folk Magic offers adequate background context surrounding misconception witches yet fails address actual physical side effects witnessed during event itself Thus further research needs conducted explore various aspects incident before clear conclusions able drawn.

 

 

With Love, Revenge

Retribution isn’t an actual existence however a subject principally including show and different books. Subsequently, the most ideal approach to investigate retribution is to once in a while check the story close by. As a dramatization, the awfulness of retribution is principally character – driven, the intention of the character is straightforward: retaliation – under the name of adoration. Bel-imperia is looking for retribution on her darling, Andre. The thought process speaks to a cozy connection between certainty of misfortune and vengeance and love.

The subject of affection and retribution in Shakespeare’s “Hamlet’s Love” is one of Hamlet’s most remarkable topics, however one preferred position – the intensity of vengeance advances Hamlet’s adoration. I will vindicate the homicide of his dad. While Hamlet was befuddled, he discovered that his mom got hitched to his uncle not long after his dad kicked the bucket. Despite the fact that he didn’t question the sudden passing of his dad soon he was as yet stunned. As Kenneth Muir stated, “He (Hamlet) was stunned by Gertrude.

Retribution is want for vengeance and fairness. At the point when the individual you love gets injured, that nature will vindicate. In any case, inaccurate conduct of these counter can prompt genuine results. In the awfulness of William Shakespeare ‘Hamlet’, Fortinbras, Hamlet, Lertes demonstrated that their craving for retribution unavoidably prompts misfortune. By losing somebody you love, Hamlet ‘s job has made it conceivable to make a move. The youthful Fortinbras established a military to restore the land lost by his dad to Hamlet and the lord.

Both Hamlet and Leltus added to the vengeance of the showy topic. Both of these characters love their dad definitely. That is the reason they are delivering retribution. Be that as it may, their adoration is misshaped, and now they want to fight back against the passing of their dads. Be that as it may, they treat it in different ways. Hamlet realized who murdered his dad, yet he didn’t make a move right away. Rarthes was somewhat indistinct, which was the reason for his dad’s passing, yet he quickly acted to vindicate him. “For heck, unwaveringness! Promise,

Retribution is the topic of this film. We saw this when Sook-hee promised to vindicate her dad’s passing, her better half, and her retribution once more. Retribution is the explanation behind acquainting her with the universe of Assassin and helping her accomplish her objectives. It has become an endless loop of her. In some cases I see it influences her, however this is by all accounts the best thing knowing how Sook-hee does. She is carrying on a “typical” life and decided to render retribution while strolling. Despite the fact that it appears to be a toy of her destiny, Sook-hee settles on his own choice

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer