The language of qualitative research can be confusing

 

 

The language of qualitative research can be confusing. The words sound like regular English, but they have very particular meanings. To make the language even more complicated, the definitions can vary across different qualitative methodological scholars.
For the purpose of this course, distinctions between two important concepts should be considered:
1. Theoretical framework: the use of constructs and propositions a recognized theory (or theories) to a research problem, purpose, and question.
• Examples: Social Influence theory, transformational leadership theory, game theory
2. Conceptual framework: the construction of ideas, assumptions, and beliefs sourced in both the literature and one’s own experience, which identify the main concepts that guide the formulation of the research problem, purpose, and question.
• Examples: Concepts from positive psychology, mindfulness meditation, language development models
To prepare for this Discussion:

Sample Solution

What exactly is qualitative research? If we want a precise definition of qualitative research, particularly one that addresses its distinguishing trait of being “qualitative,” the literature is scant. In this article, we search, identify, and analyze 89 publications that use or attempt to define the term “qualitative.” Then, building on ideas strewn across current literature and Becker’s famous research of marijuana consumption, we create and illustrate a definition that attempts to encapsulate its fundamental aspects. We define qualitative research as an iterative process in which the scientific community gains a better knowledge of the subject being examined by creating new meaningful distinctions.

democracy, diminishes the instinct for innovation and creativity.

In the General Provisions of the 2016 revised Implementing Rules and Regulations of RA 9184 Section 2, it has been stated that the provisions of this IRR are in line with the commitment of the GoP to promote good governance and its effort to adhere to the principles of transparency, accountability, equity, efficiency, and economy in its procurement process.

INTRO TO BODY:

Public procurement in the Philippines disembarks a prominent example of how much the specifics of implementation can matter. If transparency is to allow communal oversight, disclosure must meet particular conditions of accessibility and usability. According to most cases, simply posting information online is not enough. For real transparency, data must be open to the public without gates, it must be published in open and machine-readable formats, and it must be available in bulk. It is known that none of the main issues which humanity is facing will be resolved without access to information (Deloire, 2017).

Published in 2003, the Republic Act 9184 is known as the Government Procurement Reform Act. Upon ample revision, the researcher would be pleased to present a brief view of the primary parts of the Republic Act 9184 revised in the year 2006.

Section 1. Short Title and Purpose

This 2016 Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations, hereinafter called the IRR, is promulgated pursuant to Section 75 of Republic Act No. (R.A.) 9184, otherwise known as the “Government Procurement Reform Act,” for the purpose of prescribing the necessary rules and regulations for the modernization, standardization, and regulation of the procurement activities of the Government of the Philippines (GoP).

Section 2. Declaration of Policy

The provisions of this IRR are in line with the commitment of the GoP to promote good governance and its effort to adhere to the principles of transparency, accountability, equity, efficien

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.