The Mystery Of Mercury

Competency 2: Interpret human behaviors using theories of human lifespan development across developmental domains.
Apply Gilligan’s and Kohlberg’s theory of moral development to a case study.
Apply Perry’s theory of cognitive development to a case study.
Apply Levinson’s season of life to a case study.
Apply Erikson’s and Cohen’s theories of adult development and aging to a case study.
Evaluate the effectiveness of a research study to explain human behavior.
Interpret human behavior using knowledge of human development.

Sample Solution

This guide explores how various developmental theories can be applied to understand human behavior across the lifespan. We’ll delve into common case studies and analyze them using:

  • Moral Development:
    • Gilligan’s Theory:Focuses on moral reasoning centered on care and responsibility for others.
    • Kohlberg’s Theory:Emphasizes moral reasoning based on justice, fairness, and universal principles.
  • Cognitive Development:
    • Perry’s Scheme of Intellectual and Ethical Development:Examines how students approach complex ideas and develop their own meaning-making.
  • Adult Development:
    • Levinson’s Seasons of Life:Explores predictable stages of development with challenges and transitions throughout adulthood.
    • Erikson’s Stages of Psychosocial Development:Identifies key psychosocial conflicts individuals face at each stage of life.
    • Cohen’s Stages of Socioemotional Selectivity Theory:Investigates how social motivations change with age.

Case Study Example:

Sarah (42): Sarah, a dedicated nurse manager, feels increasingly frustrated with the ethical practices at her hospital. She witnesses cost-cutting measures that compromise patient care. While she fears speaking up might jeopardize her job, she also feels a responsibility to advocate for her patients.

Analysis:

  • Moral Development:
    • Gilligan:Sarah’s concern for patient well-being reflects a focus on care-based morality.
    • Kohlberg:Sarah’s struggle between job security and ethical responsibility suggests a movement towards principled morality (Stage 5).
  • Cognitive Development (Perry):If Sarah starts questioning established hospital practices and seeks information from diverse sources, she might be transitioning from “Dualism” (accepting authority) to “Relativism” (considering multiple perspectives).
  • Adult Development:
    • Levinson (Midlife Transition):Sarah’s concerns could signal the questioning and reevaluation characteristic of the “Entering the Midlife Transition” stage (40s-50s).
    • Erikson (Generativity vs. Stagnation):Striving to improve patient care aligns with Erikson’s concept of generativity, the desire to contribute meaningfully to the world.
    • Cohen (Socioemotional Selectivity Theory):Sarah’s potential shift in social priorities might reflect a focus on emotionally meaningful relationships and a desire to leave a positive legacy (characteristic of later adulthood).

Evaluating Research:

A strong research study on human behavior should be:

  • Methodologically sound:Employ appropriate research methods (surveys, experiments) to collect valid and reliable data.
  • Ethical:Ensure ethical treatment of participants and informed consent.
  • Valid and reliable:Produce consistent and generalizable results.
  • Contribute to existing knowledge:Offer new insights or replicate prior findings.

Interpreting Human Behavior:

By understanding different developmental theories, we can gain valuable insights into human behavior. Consider factors like age, life experiences, and social context when interpreting a person’s actions.

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer