The parable of the Prodigal Son (Luke 15:11-32)
Read the parable of the Prodigal Son (Luke 15:11-32) and answer the following questions:
What do you believe is the main theme Jesus is communicating?
Explain the three principal characters. Who do you identify with the most, and why?
Sample Solution
The Parable of the Prodigal Son is found in Luke chapter 15, verses 11-32. The main character in the parable, the forgiving father, whose character remains constant throughout the story, is the picture of God. In telling the story, Jesus identifies Himself with God in His loving attitude to the lost. The younger son symbolizes the lost, and the elder brother represents the self-righteous. I believe that the main theme that Jesus is communicating is that it is important to seek forgiveness. No matter how big or small the sin that has happened, when you seek forgiveness there will be forgiveness in all aspects.- signature applications. Is Biometric situation engineering, right off the bat, as indicated by Morosan (2011), he said that Biometric is a one of a kind human trademark and seldom change. There are two sort of biometrics with are a physiological and conduct. Physiological is less controllable by the proprietor like unique finger impression, face, retina, iris and voice. Social is more controllable by the proprietor like a mark example, penmanship and walk. Besides, a particular setting s need as acknowledgment of individual area away from the sensor. A biometric framework is a modernized framework that permits a client to be confirmed in view of their biometric with base on four parts; ' A 'Sensor module' which incorporate a peruser or scanner to get a crude biometric picture from client ' A 'Highlights Extractor module' which removes a list of capabilities from the crude biometric picture and make a layout for the client.
- ' A 'Coordinating and Decision Making module' which look at a list of capabilities removed from existing in the data set. ' A 'Information base module' which a vault of layout for a clients. Then, as per Alsaid and Mitchell (2005), they expressed that to produce a computerized signature in an information structure, it should encode it as a sequential series of pieces and bytes. Then, at that point, it is normal that the mark will unambiguously commit the underwriter of the substance to the serialized archive. Be that as it may, equivocalness can emerge in the translation of information string when it tends to be view in an unexpected way. Signature usefulness can be incorporated into explicit application as an independent application. In the event that advanced mark usefulness is change into application it must mindful with the archive configuration to stay away from any translation issues happen from dynamic substance. Moreover, the framework likewise has an issue in their dynamic substance so to beat it by empower the marking application to speak with the application t