The Problem of Other Minds.

at
Categories
Tags

 

Chapter 5 primarily deals with radical external world skepticism. An interesting philosophical problem related to external world skepticism is called, “The Problem of Other Minds.” It goes as follows:

I know that I have a mind, as I am immediately and directly aware of my own consciousness and the contents of my own mind. I know my own mind immediately and directly. I am always in “direct” contact with my own mind. However, I never experience any other mind. I infer that other people have minds based upon their behavior. When someone talks or acts a certain way I simply take it for granted that the other has a mind and is in a mental state. If someone cries out and grabs her foot, I take it that she is “in pain” (which is a particular mental state). But I am never directly aware of any mind outside of my own. It might be the case that there are no other minds at all, and that I am being tricked by a cleaver robot that is programed to “act” like it as a mind. How could I ever be certain that anyone else has a mind? What, exactly, justifies a belief that other minds exist? Justifying that I have a mind is easy. I am immediately and directly aware of my own mind. But justifying the claim that someone else has a mind is quite different. All that I am ever acquainted with is behavior, which could be produced by something that does not really have a mind. Behave alone does not prove conclusively that a thing has a mind. A sophisticated robot could be programed to act like it has a mind. What, then, justifies the belief that other minds exist? How could I distinguish between (1) a thing that looks and behaves like it has a mind but does not–and (2) a thing that behaves like it has a mind because it does (in deed) have a mind?

 

 

Sample Solution

 

 

 

How Teenagers Spend Their Money

GuidesorSubmit my paper for investigation

descriptive paper sampleAdolescence is the point at which an individual movements from being a kid to being a grown-up, prepared to take on obligations, and face the difficulties of this present reality. Simultaneously, immaturity is additionally the ideal opportunity for having some good times and treating life in likely the most loosened up way ever, which doesn’t naturally mean flippancy. In spite of the fact that numerous grown-ups trust American young people go through cash for the most part on diversion, inquire about shows this isn’t valid.

Shockingly, American young people spend substantially less cash on computer games or shows as it is generally considered. As indicated by a semiannual report gave by Piper Jaffray in April 2014, the significant piece of young people’s uses goes to nourishment (Business Insider). In reality, as the chart from the report appears, American young people enthusiastically spend about 21% of their cash on nourishment, generally at Starbucks.

The last actuality is by all accounts by one way or another associated with the new pattern in U.S. young culture, which is hanging out in eateries as opposed to in shopping centers. For instance, in 2014, American adolescents visited shopping centers on normal multiple times, contrasted with multiple times in 2007. As the report propounds, “Eateries have become a social affair spot and adolescents are progressively proposing they lean toward feasting out to different types of status brand spending. We consider eateries to be the cutting edge hang out for teenagers.” The alleged shopping center culture is by all accounts fading for more class (Quartz).

Alongside nourishment, American teenagers spend around equivalent measures of cash on garments. Generally, they offer inclination to athletic wear as opposed to denim attire. Adolescents in the U.S. appear to favor the “athleisure”— dress which can be worn both inside and outside of rec centers. Athleisure favored in 2014 is fabricated by such brands as Adidas, Lululemon, Juicy Couture, Athleta, and some others (Business Insid

 

 

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer