Evaluate the quality of democracy and its institutions in the United States in light of recent events.
Please refer to the essay rubric for an effective work.
Sample Solution
The quality of democracy and its institutions in the United States
The state of American politics has caused many to express concern that our democracy is in crisis. Yet the United States has long grappled with the tensions inherent to democracy. After the cold war ended, promoting the internal spread of democracy seemed poised to replace containment as the guiding principle of U.S. foreign policy [Sean M. Lynn-Jones, 1998]. In recent years, however, critics have argued that spreading democracy may be unwise or even harmful. Do contemporary concerns indicate that American democracy is in fact in serious jeopardy, or do they reflect the tensions inherent to America’s political system? This paper addresses this debate. It argues that the United States should promote democracy, especially liberal democracy, as it benefits the citizens of new democracies, promotes internal peace, and serve U.S. interests, and refutes some of the most important arguments against U.S. efforts to spread democracy.
ovide services. Interprofessional collaboration is known as the growth of initiatives that are considered to increase the use of health care services, hardly, is the connection of the social worker and pharmacist in the works, but benefits in patient care may be reached through the presence of this cooperative determination. Collaborative communications show a unification of professional values and are accomplished through sharing skills and information to improve the patient care. It is important as a group to have strong and open communication because everyone input is important, active decision making, trusting each other, and leadership. It can be challenging when working with another profession because they won’t entirely know the knowledge, skills, and abilities that members of other profession bring to the team, but in this interprofessional group I attended it was not the case. Interprofessional collaboration between pharmacist and social workers involves the ability to make changes from the mainly professional-based vision that most professions have the approval of a sense of collaboration and a share goal. The letdowns that can progress from inappropriate collaboration and communication between health care professionals can have a harmful impact on health care results, reduce the value of medical decisions, and make mistakes when it comes to implementing choices this explains why group structure is important.
To begin with, there were goals and objectives we had to accomplish to provide the patient, 81-year-old Mr. Brown what he needed to improve his results. Those goals were to analyze patient information to identify psychosocial issues, recommend intervention options for the patient’s care plan make recommendations for coordination of the patient’s care plan and develop a shared goal. As we read over the Mr. Brown case, there were several issues that had to be addressed far as HTN (25 years), CHF (3 years), T2DM, 4 years (controlled without medication) Osteoarthritis (OA), bilateral knees, and bunionectomy. He also dealt with depression. His most pressing problems were to prevent readmission, self-care, medication adherence, lifestyle changes & patient education, grief counseling and poor vision which affects his everyday life. We narrowed it down to the most important issues and provided interventions for him. Also, we had goals and objectives set once we figured out what types of therapy and services we had set up for him. Preventing readmission was one of the important issues and educating him about his diseases, finding out what medication was working or wasn’t working for his diseases was the solution to the first issue. The second issue was about his medication, as we spoke on the goals for his medication adherence because he was not consistent with taking his medication, the combined efforts between a social worker and pharmacist rise during t