The quality of research often depends on the quality of the question driving it

 

 

Develop questions about foundational historical events that inform personal assumptions, beliefs, and values using evidence from primary and secondary sources
Determine fundamental approaches to studying history in addressing questions about how events are shaped by their larger historical context
Investigate major developments in the progression of historical inquiry for informing critical questions related to historical narrative
Articulate the value of examining historical events for their impact on contemporary issues
Overview
Study the past if you would define the future.
—Confucius
Many people argue that we are products of our past. However, as the Chinese philosopher Confucius suggested, because the contemporary events taking place around us have histories, we can examine them to understand how and why the events came to be. By developing the skills needed to investigate those histories, we can uncover the historical roots of current events and learn from them. Researching, examining narratives, uncovering personal biases, and finding credible resources are some of those skills. We might not want to be historians in the future, but we should all understand how to look at things from a historical standpoint to better understand contemporary issues.

For this project, you will choose a historical event to explore from the Library Research Guide. These events fit into the topic areas of:

Inequality and human rights
Political revolutions
Climate change
Globalization
Directions
Read these directions and the rubric criteria and reach out to your instructor if you have any questions before you begin working on this project. Many of the steps below will require you to reference and utilize the work you have done in previous modules of this course. You may use the provided template to complete this project or choose not to use the template and submit a Word document instead.

Part 1: Creating a Research Question: The quality of research often depends on the quality of the question driving it. It is important to understand how personal opinions, perspectives, and historical sources all play a part in developing and examining a research question. Complete the following steps to discuss how you developed a strong research question about your chosen historical event.

Sample Solution

Clinicians, educators, and scholars construct their work on the foundation of research. It establishes the boundaries of our field and shapes the way we think about it. As a result, researchers are responsible for producing high-quality results; we rely on them to ensure that their techniques are rigorous and their reasoning is good. This column focuses on research questions, which are the first step in the research process. When it comes to evaluating the quality of a researcher’s work, the reader should start with the issue that drives their investigation, since if the question is faulty, the quality of the methodology and the soundness of the researchers’ reasoning are irrelevant.

To consider de Gaulle in contrast to the characteristic hypothesis and groundbreaking initiative, the paper examinations him as a pioneer and person. To accomplish this, the paper has focuses on his assets and open doors that are introduced to him, since they best outline how the significant hypotheses add to his prosperity as a pioneer.

While assessing de Gaulle’s assets his attributes are promptly recognizable to those featured by Stogill (1948 and 1974), Mann (1959), Lord, DeVader, and Alliger (1986) and Kirkpatrick and Locke (1991) in their examination. De Gaulle was of a better than expected knowledge. Specifically, his vital theoretical reasoning was amazing. For instance, de Gaulle knew that for France to stay a worldwide power they should have an atomic capacity. On July 22, 1958, de Gaulle, presently president, put it down on the calendar for the main nuclear blast to happen inside the initial three months of 1960 . For de Gaulle particularly, French fulfillment of the bomb represented freedom and a job for France in international issues . This was an obvious sign of France’s worldwide goal and featured de Gaulle’s premonition and long haul vision, apparently a vital quality to be a pioneer. He was incredibly energetic and adored his nation and a big motivator for it. He had a solid character, verging on haughtiness on occasion and all the more so in his later years.

The open doors that added to de Gaulle’s prosperity are the point at which he ended up in the situation as the administrator of the Free French Forces, which he had not arranged. He ousts to the UK instead of give up and haggled with Germany, a critical appearance of the man’s nationalism and obligation to his country. This piece of his life apparently set the situation for de Gaulle to turn into the President of France. The finish of the conflict, and specifically its prosperity, depicted de Gaulle as a legend. Nonetheless, there are a few unanswered inquiries, imagine a scenario in which the Normandy arrivals had fizzled, would De Gaulle have been so fruitful. The contention that de Gaulle saw an open door, incidental or not, and promoted. For instance, by definition, charming pioneers are supposed to arise in the midst of emergency De Gaulle exploited each a valuable open door, demonstrating that he not entirely settled to get France once again to being Grand. The Algerian War was one more open door that De Gaulle was not searching for, in any case, introduced its self and set the climate appealling pioneer to succeed.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.