Research consistently shows that the relationship between intelligence and school performance only explains 25% of the variance. Thus, success in school must be related to other factors. Is this relatively low variance surprising to you? Explain. What are some environmental or other factors, in addition to intelligence, that may impact school performance? Paraphrase the textbook information into your own words—avoid relying on quotations. Needs APA format integrated within discussion and reference list. Main posts need a minimum of one course textbook citation and one peer reviewed journal article (published in last five to ten years) or potential point reduction. Needs APA format integrated within discussion and reference list.
While intelligence is undoubtedly a significant factor in academic performance, the fact that it only accounts for 25% of the variance in school success might seem surprising at first glance. However, upon closer examination, this relatively low percentage makes sense. School performance is a complex outcome influenced by a multitude of factors beyond inherent intelligence.
Environmental and Other Factors Influencing School Performance:
1. Socioeconomic Status (SES): Students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds often face challenges that impede their academic success. Limited access to resources like quality education, nutritious food, and stable housing can significantly impact learning (American Psychological Association, 2020).
2. Family and Home Environment: A supportive home environment with involved parents, positive role models, and access to learning materials can foster a strong foundation for academic success. Conversely, a chaotic or unstable home life can negatively impact a child’s concentration and motivation (Brophy, 2014).
3. Motivation and Self-Efficacy: A student’s intrinsic motivation, sense of self-efficacy, and belief in their ability to succeed in school are crucial. Students who are passionate about learning and believe in their own capabilities are more likely to persevere and achieve their goals (Zimmerman, 2000).
4. Teacher Quality and Classroom Environment: Effective teachers who create engaging and stimulating learning environments play a vital role in student success. Access to qualified teachers and a supportive classroom culture can positively influence student engagement and achievement (Darling-Hammond, 2010).
5. Peer Influence and Social Support: A student’s social network, including peers and friends, can impact their academic motivation and behaviors. Positive peer influence can encourage academic pursuits, while negative influences can lead to disengagement from school.
6. Mental and Physical Health: Students facing mental health challenges like anxiety or depression, or experiencing physical health problems, may struggle to focus and perform well academically. Access to mental health services and proper medical care can positively impact their academic success (Costello, 2003).
Conclusion:
Understanding the multifaceted nature of school success is essential for creating effective educational interventions. Focusing solely on intelligence as a predictor overlooks the crucial role of environmental, social, and personal factors. By addressing these broader influences, educators and policymakers can create a more equitable and supportive learning environment for all students, regardless of their individual intelligence levels.
References:
American Psychological Association. (2020). Poverty and socioeconomic status. https://www.apa.org/topics/poverty
Brophy, J. (2014). Motivating students to learn. Routledge.
Costello, E. J., Angold, A., & Burns, B. J. (2003). The relationship between mental health and school performance in children and adolescents. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44(7), 987–999. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00188
Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teacher education and the American future. Teachers College Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1022