Articulations of Happiness and Well Being on Social Media through the viewpoint of Aristotle’s “Nicomachean Ethics”
As any Facebook or Tumblr client can bear witness to, individuals love to impart their most joyful minutes to their companions. Weddings, graduations, intriguing get-aways, and other groundbreaking positive encounters pull in numerous preferences, also the consideration and jealousy of the perusers. Satisfaction is engaging and is, generally, the primary objective for the normal individual’s life. We as a whole need to be cheerful. We likewise need to impart our joy to other people and furthermore impact them in a constructive manner.
Aristotle philosophizes that satisfaction is a definitive telos for an individual. Telos, interpreted from Greek, signifies “end.” People act in order to reach an end that is advantageous to their lives. An individual who trains for a considerable length of time for a long distance race plans to run in the opposition. Right now, telos, or objective, of the sprinter is to be prepared to contend in the race. This end, be that as it may, is just the methods for accomplishing a better quality. For what reason does the person need to contend? To be effective and solid. For what reason be fruitful and sound? To be glad. The following coherent inquiry is: Why does one need to be glad? Aristotle would respond to this inquiry by saying that bliss is the most noteworthy great: the Supreme Good. He states, “everything that we pick we decide for something different — aside from joy, which is an end” (Nicomachean
Morals: X, 6). While this sprinter prepared to accomplish the benefit of wellbeing and achievement, their definitive objective is satisfaction. The minor objectives en route were essentially intends to accomplish the Supreme Good. Despite the fact that the quest for joy is general, the issue emerges in thinking about what establishes an upbeat life.
The upbeat minutes that are shared via web-based networking media — the Instagram pictures, the Facebook status chantges, and the Twitter tweets — are insufficient to contain a cheerful life. These upbeat “minutes” are, by the by, just “minutes.” They are transient and rare. An inquiry surfaces: Can a real existence brimming with upbeat minutes, while the rest are normal or in any case unremarkable, comprise cheerful life? Aristotle, in his exemplary work Nicomachean Ethics, contends that an individual’s life must be dissected all in all together for the person in question to be viewed as cheerful. What isn’t clear is whether it is all the more compensating to encounter a couple of seconds of exceptionally serious bliss dispersed through one’s life or a lifetime of minor, not excessively energizing lovely feelings. It is likewise not satisfactory to what degree sharing one’s upbeat encounters or one’s endeavors to impact others’ bliss can assist one’s with owning joy.
Aristotle muses on the narrative of Priam of Troy. Priam encountered an extensive stretch of satisfaction and success at the same time, in his previous lifestyle, he wound up losing his realm, a large portion of his family, and ul
