The role of news media in the standardization of labelling


Discuss the role of news media in the standardization of labeling. Compare and contrast two specific news outlets in their approach to one specific bias-related labeling situation. What are the differences in immediate effect between these two approaches? What are the social implications of the situation?

Sample Answer

With the advancement in digital technology, the role of mass media has been changing more progressively from new anchorage to commerce advertisement and promotion. In fact, the mass media as currently constituted appear to be in promotion of god and services in some of their programs which is essential no doubt, in helping the public to make critical decision on particular issues. This paper explores the role of news media in standardization of labeling


Cash has been called numerous things. It has been said to be the base of all malicious. I took a near religions class in school, and I was revealed to it was a religion. It likewise has been disclosed to me that cash runs the world. I might want to consider these assumptions, as I think they have numerous consistent openings and legends appended to them.

Cash is showy. It attracts us with its pretty pictures and how the media depicts it as something awesome. In any case, I can't battle that cash is the base of shrewdness. Or maybe, I would express that eagerness is the establishment of bad behavior. Voracity is a feeling that the self image consistently needs more, and more for itself. It additionally infers that it couldn't care less for the affliction or situation of others, regardless of whether securing assets or money hurts others. In this way, it is somewhat individuals' self images that are the premise of insidiousness. Cash is just a piece of paper, or a metal coin us people have formed to symbolize money. Cash is innocuous all alone. Without its specific circumstance and use, it would be just useless material. As such, by giving it importance and endeavoring to snatch a greater amount of it dependent on this noteworthiness regardless of others, we cause malicious. I have been known to be a cheap individual who is liberal on occasion. I have additionally been referred to by the greater part of my companions as non-materialistic. In this way, it very well may be said that I have not carried out any evil thing dependent on cash, regardless of it being asserted as being "the foundation of underhandedness."

Another incredible explanation is that cash is a religion. Oxford Dictionaries portrays religion as, "The confidence in and love of a superhuman controlling influence, particularly an individual God or divine beings." It would be hard to state cash is an "a superhuman controlling influence." If we by one way or another give this influence to cash, it is on the grounds that somebody is hallucinating or unreasonable. There might be individuals who venerate cash, yet I don't figure they would consider it a religion. By and by, I don't feel any attract to venerate cash—particularly as something powerful. I think the main time I have heard cash being treated as a religion is the point at which somebody is utilizing slang, similar to "Fella, cash is your religion. You can't quit pursuing that green!"

Presently, the possibility that cash runs the world is totally conceivable—I simply don't think it is valid. With aggregates controlling the business sectors, tycoons making increasingly more every year, improvement, and the contracting of the working class, it is anything but difficult to state that cash is the principle power on our planet. In any case, I think the catchphrase is "association." I think what rules are the associations between every one of us. These connections are not just advanced, for example, those via web-based networking media and the Internet when all is said in done—yet in addition our beneficial interaction on a physical level. We by one way or another work together to live on one planet without all murdering one another. That is an accomplishment in itself. Most creatures run on sense, yet we are an alternate kind of creature. We have a created cognizance that permits us to settle on our own decisions. Furthermore, with this opportunity, it is amazing the amount we appreciate continuing one another, regardless of whether legitimately or by implication, through our work, volunteering, and humble undertakings. We additionally discover time to adore, express empathy, and manufacture understanding—which most creatures don't jump into. Without a doubt, cash controls our economies and regularly our expectations for everyday comforts, except it doesn't control how we are basically. In my own life, cash has barely had a significant spot. I have lived generally for friendship, imagination, and otherworldly development. To me, cash is to a greater extent an instrument and a way to live regularly. It doesn't characterize who I am, and my general surroundings, as I would see it.

Cash is said to be numerous things by innumerable individuals. In any case, in my experience, cash isn't the base of malevolence, isn't a religion, and doesn't run the world. Or maybe, avarice makes individuals carry out sick things, cash is an apparatus, and what rules on our planet is our associations between one another. This is just my appearance, so I would not put cash down on reality of these announcements.Cash has been called numerous things. It has been said to be the base of all malicious. I took a near religions class in school, and I was revealed to it was a religion. It likewise has been disclosed to me that cash runs the world. I might want to consider these assumptions, as I think they have numerous consistent openings and legends appended to them.

Cash is showy. It attracts us with its pretty pictures and how the media depicts it as something awesome. In any case, I can't battle that cash is the base of shrewdness. Or maybe, I would express that eagerness is the establishment of bad behavior. Voracity is a feeling that the self image consistently needs more, and more for itself. It additionally infers that it couldn't care less for the affliction or situation of others, regardless of whether securing assets or money hurts others. In this way, it is somewhat individuals' self images that are the premise of insidiousness. Cash is just a piece of paper, or a metal coin us people have formed to symbolize money. Cash is innocuous all alone. Without its specific circumstance and use, it would be just useless material. As such, by giving it importance and endeavoring to snatch a greater amount of it dependent on this noteworthiness regardless of others, we cause malicious. I have been known to be a cheap individual who is liberal on occasion. I have additionally been referred to by the greater part of my companions as non-materialistic. In this way, it very well may be said that I have not carried out any evil thing dependent on cash, regardless of it being asserted as being "the foundation of underhandedness."

Another incredible explanation is that cash is a religion. Oxford Dictionaries portrays religion as, "The confidence in and love of a superhuman controlling influence, particularly an individual God or divine beings." It would be hard to state cash is an "a superhuman controlling influence." If we by one way or another give this influence to cash, it is on the grounds that somebody is hallucinating or unreasonable. There might be individuals who venerate cash, yet I don't figure they would consider it a religion. By and by, I don't feel any attract to venerate cash—particularly as something powerful. I think the main time I have heard cash being treated as a religion is the point at which somebody is utilizing slang, similar to "Fella, cash is your religion. You can't quit pursuing that green!"

Presently, the possibility that cash runs the world is totally conceivable—I simply don't think it is valid. With aggregates controlling the business sectors, tycoons making increasingly more every year, improvement, and the contracting of the working class, it is anything but difficult to state that cash is the principle power on our planet. In any case, I think the catchphrase is "association." I think what rules are the associations between every one of us. These connections are not just advanced, for example, those via web-based networking media and the Internet when all is said in done—yet in addition our beneficial interaction on a physical level. We by one way or another work together to live on one planet without all murdering one another. That is an accomplishment in itself. Most creatures run on sense, yet we are an alternate kind of creature. We have a created cognizance that permits us to settle on our own decisions. Furthermore, with this opportunity, it is amazing the amount we appreciate continuing one another, regardless of whether legitimately or by implication, through our work, volunteering, and humble undertakings. We additionally discover time to adore, express empathy, and manufacture understanding—which most creatures don't jump into. Without a doubt, cash controls our economies and regularly our expectations for everyday comforts, except it doesn't control how we are basically. In my own life, cash has barely had a significant spot. I have lived generally for friendship, imagination, and otherworldly development. To me, cash is to a greater extent an instrument and a way to live regularly. It doesn't characterize who I am, and my general surroundings, as I would see it.

Cash is said to be numerous things by innumerable individuals. In any case, in my experience, cash isn't the base of malevolence, isn't a religion, and doesn't run the world. Or maybe, avarice makes individuals carry out sick things, cash is an apparatus, and what rules on our planet is our associations between one another. This is just my appearance, so I would not put cash down on reality of these announcements.