Identify some of the skills or characteristics that are needed by a manager in the start-up phase of a business, and explain how they differ from the skills or characteristics needed later to manage a larger, established firm.
When managing a start-up business, it is important to have skills or characteristics that are different from those needed when managing a large established business.
During the start-up stage, managers must be able to think quickly on their feet and be comfortable with a high degree of ambiguity as they create structure and processes for the new business. Managers should also have strong leadership skills because they will need to establish credibility among employees and potential customers. Additionally, since resources are often limited in the early days of any company, managers should possess excellent problem solving skills to make the most out of what is available (Kasulis 2020).
At larger more established companies, however, different skill sets are necessary due to increased complexity. Managers need excellent communication skills for coordinating between departments; strong financial acumen for budgeting; strategic planning capabilities for long term success; and organizational development experience for driving change initiatives (Hoffman &Tropardo 2019). They also need an eye toward innovation so that these companies can remain competitive in their respective markets. Since these firms will typically employ many more people than smaller start-ups, managerial roles become more specialized with certain experts taking on specific tasks such as marketing or operations management.
In conclusion, while some skills—such as leadership—are applicable across both types of businesses, there are still distinct differences in terms of what is required by a manager depending on whether they’re working at an early stage organization or one that has been around longer and grown significantly in size.
regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pieces of data that can be put away in prompt (present moment) memory, how much data inside every one of those lumps can be very high, without unfavorably influencing the review of similar number