The Supreme Court’s Justification Of High-School Urine Tests”

 

Reading both popular and professional literature is an activity fraught with risk. In this age of electronic communication, wikis, sound bites, and rapid dissemination of news and other information, there is an increased risk that information you access may not be accurate. The likelihood of being exposed to “urban myths” or false information that appears to be based on scientific information is much greater than it ever has been. As will be emphasized next week, it is important even in professional articles and reputable journals to be able to distinguish good research from bad, valid arguments from invalid ones, and fact from fiction.
As a scholar practitioner, then, it is essential for you to be a critical thinker when reading, listening to, searching for, and reviewing information. Critical thinking involves learning what the potential pitfalls are in written or broadcasted materials, analyzing the material you encounter for the presence of these pitfalls, as well as other errors in thinking and reasoning, and using your analysis to determine the weight you should give the information obtained from any source. Using critical thinking to sort out the facts from suppositions or hypotheses that are not actually true or clearly tested is one of the most important basic skills you can master. Critical thinking is a tool you will need and use throughout your professional education, training, and practice.

Review the articles provided in this week’s resources, “Urinalysis: The Supreme Court’s Justification Of High-School Urine Tests” and “Vaccines May Fuel Autism Epidemic.

Provide an analysis of the articles from a critical thinking perspective.
Identify at least three errors in each of the two articles.
Explain the implications of the errors you identified for your professional psychology practice.
Be specific, provide examples, and justify your response with the Learning Resources/literature.
https://www.wnd.com/2003/06/19204/

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2002/07/supreme-court-urinalysis.html

 

Sample Solution

vernment promoting academisation and increased autonomy from Local Authority (LA) schools are having to make the decisions on how to use their funds. Current government is keen to see improved performance in the country’s schools, according to Schools White Paper 2016 “We want to put more power into the hands of the best school and system leaders, and to extend their reach. A more autonomous school system is even more dependent on outstanding educational leaders “ (Gov.UK, 2016:13) clearly the governments aim is to create a school system that is self improving, embedding better training systems to develop more high quality leaders also making schools more autonomous.

An SBM works with Headteachers ensuring schools manage resources effectively and efficiently to achieve better outcomes for pupils, allowing Headteachers to focus on leading, teaching and learning. My school doesn’t have an SBM, if we did the school would be better prepared for any changes, taking pressure off the Heads by not only making significant savings, but also identifying new sources of funding ensuring successful results of school improvement plans. This will also allow for better preparedness and manage risks by planning ahead.

3.2 Key drivers behind the development of the profession to date & challenges for the future:

SBM role has expanded significantly over recent years; there is an increase in the professional development offered to SBM’s.
A greater emphasis on schools to develop their own capacity as level of support offered by LA’s on core business functions has reduced. Demand for SBM’s is greater due to increased pressure on Headteachers, many coming solely from an educational background some maybe struggling with additional tasks of managing resources effectively, which might have a negative impact on deputies and middle leaders applying for headship.

According to NCTL report (Gov.UK: 12) “Secretary of State for Education pledged to qualify 1000 SBMs by 2006” helps by enabling Headteachers to focus on teaching and learning rather then administration duties. SBM programs were developed and implemented with successful results. Unfortunately, there is still a lack of understanding about the role and more needs to be done to increase the perception, my associate head for example doesn’t fully understand the role of an SBM, but is fully supportive of my development with this course another barrier is lack of funding for the role especially in Primary schools. However based on Geoff Southworth’s SBM A quiet revolution “Most secondary schools enjoy 90% access to a School Business Manager” (Southworth, 2010:6) there’s scope to increase the number of SBMs, if schools can tackle barriers such as affordability, LA resistant’s and lack of understanding for the role. NASBM and other associations are leading the way to increasing the profile of the role through the development of training programs such as DSBM, ADSBM and SBD the benefits of SBMs became more evident by financial savings and increased income, but much promotion is needed so schools reap the benefits of appointing an SBM, collaborations between schools and local communities by sharing expertise cou

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.