The transition from feudalism to capitalism

Sample Solution

The transition from feudalism to capitalism Gender refers to the characteristics of women, men, girls and boys that are socially constructed. This includes norms, behaviors and roles associated with being a woman, man, girl or boy, as well as relationships with each other. As a social construct, gender varies from society to society and can change over time (S.J Kessler, W McKenna 1985). Sexism is defined as individuals` attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors, and organizational, institutional, and cultural practices that either reflect negative evaluations of individuals based on their gender or support unequal status of women and men (JK Swim, L.L Hyers, 2009). Gender is instilled through socialization immediately from birth. Consider the gender norms with which society imbues infants. The most archetypal example is the notion that male babies like blue things while female babies like pink things. The example set by an individual`s family is also important for socialization.

he initiation of superficial bargaining efforts, which have proved to be impossible to respect. The main aspect that permanently amplifies these military confrontations is the existence of an impressive military arsenal that can be used anytime. 2. The irreconcilability between the two authorities was amplified by the 2005 Hamas electoral gain, which in fact meant the uprooting of the organization’s terrorist actions based on popular support. 3. One main cause of the failure of the agreements signed between the two parties is that the penalties stipulated for the reopening of the armed conflict were not respected and the international community had a pale reaction. 4. Apart from the security and geopolitical aspects, the impossibility of reconciling the two sides is also strongly supported by ethnic, social and especially religious differences.

Conclusions and solutions

Knowing the complexity of the situation, the tensions in the area as well as the political, religious and social implications, as the author of this article, provide for the following situations: 1. Concluding an agreement aimed at the immediate cessation of violence. – Establishing a permanent peace. This is an issue that would be of interest to both parties – Hamas would have the opportunity to administer the territory under its authority and to settle accounts with Al Fatah, while Israel would be able to handle the Iranian issue. Such bargaining attempts have taken place since the Clinton administration in 2000, the Taba Negotiations in 2001 or the 2003 Geneva Initiative. A resumption of these diplomatic discussions is hindered by Hamas for two reasons – 1. This peace would mean recognizing Israel’s legitimacy over the confluence territories of the two sides. 2. Hamas would lose the conflict initiative that provided its popular support, losing ground to Al Fatah rivals. 2. Israel’s withdrawal from the West Bank and the presence of delegated troops from the international community at the border between the two territories. These terms of negotiation would help both camps. First, Israel would benefit from long-term secured security and Hamas could benefit from the possibility of establishing a state recognized by the international community. In the case of such an agreement, the issue of holy places and the problem of refugees could be regulated by evacuating Israelis from the West Bank and creating a separation route whose Israeli boundaries do not include the neighboring Arab territories of East Jerusalem, Ariel and the Ma’aleh region Adumin. Returning to Islamic contexts, Islamic fundamentalist terrorism, as we have shown, is forbidden by the Quran and other Islamic laws, and fundamentalism is only a form of extreme manifestation of highly politicized Islamic beliefs and exegetical interpretations Of spiritual leaders. However, the main cause of Islamic terrorism is not the above-mentioned thesis, but rather the social conditions in the are