Theoretical and Evidence-based Practice

at
Categories
Tags

 

Choose a theoretical approach, or an integration of different approaches which your Team considers can best serve your client group.
Explain the concepts and techniques your Team will use for the client group.
Based on research findings, discuss its effectiveness in applying this approach in working with these clinical issues and client groups.
Discuss the limitation of the chosen theoretical approach(es).
Discuss ethical and diverse considerations when applying this therapy to the group.

 

Sample Solution

Our team has chosen to use an integrative humanistic approach in working with our clients. This approach is based on the idea that people have a natural capacity for growth and self-actualization, and that we are all responsible for our own behavior and personal development (Corey, 2020). We believe this approach is best suited for our client group because it emphasizes the holistic nature of individual needs; it is built upon the notion of empowering individuals by recognizing their strengths while also acknowledging areas of improvement (Corey, 2020).

The techniques we plan to use include client-centered therapy, psychodrama, Gestalt therapy , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT )and Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT). Client – centered therapy focuses on understanding how unique experiences influence thoughts , emotions and behaviors in order to foster positive psychological change. Psychodrama utilizes role play as a method of exploring feelings and behaviors through creative expression. Gestalt therapy emphasizes present awareness with an emphasis on addressing unfinished business from past events. CBT helps clients identify maladaptive thought patterns which can be altered through cognitive restructuring techniques. MBCT combines mindfulness meditation practices with cognitive strategies used in CBT in order to reduce stress levels (Robinson et al., 2018 ).

Research suggests that there may be potential benefits associated with using an integrative humanistic approach when working with this particular client group; specifically those related to improved interpersonal relationships, increased sense of autonomy, better emotional regulation skills, more effective problem solving skills, greater insight into personal issues and more adaptive coping strategies (Pargament & Shafranske, 2019 ). These findings support our decision in choosing an integrative humanistic approach when working with this client group.

 

 

The Revenger’s Tragedy

Misfortune of Avengers What sort of misfortune is this? By definition, the misfortune is “a staggering, excruciating, dismal occasion”. Notwithstanding, the awfulness of Avengers doesn’t uncover every one of these highlights. It is frightful and abnormal, loaded with wicked, brutal, dead and maniacal grisly clarifications, however this is certainly not a dismal story. Instead of cause the crowd to feel distress, they regularly draw mind blowing doubtful feelings. The reason for the misfortune isn’t inefficient sorrow, however to utilize retaliation as a persuading intends to cause contempt.

Shakespeare’s “Hamlet” shows the overall components found in the awfulness of the retribution of the renaissance (“misfortune of vengeance”). Be that as it may, despite the fact that Hamlet is a misfortune of vengeance, Shakespeare confounds the essential retribution plot by making three vengeance plots. By including significant advancements, Shakespeare makes ‘Ship of the Concentric Revenge Miwa’ (Frye 90) which is definitely not a physical legend yet a phantom, not an apparition, yet a scholarly saint who is an issue. did. viewpoint

In this investigation of retribution and vengeance of Elizabeth ‘s vengeance, the two plays I see are the “Hamlet” of William Shakespeare and “The Tragedy of Avengers” of Thomas Middleton. After first observing the treatment of the dramatist ‘s Avengers’ character, different characters in the play will deal with the Avengers. Despite the fact that their essential topic and shows are comparable, the two plays show a differentiating picture of vengeance; rather than “Vindicator’s misfortune”, Hamlet is an increasingly complex of his hero Provide treatment restricted by the creator’s social data and lacking

The awfulness of vengeance (some of the time called retribution dramatization, vengeance show or grisly misfortune) is a sort of hypothesis whose fundamental subject is the deadly aftereffect of vengeance and retribution. American instructor Ashley H. Thorndiek formally reported the awfulness of vengeance in the 1902 article “Connection among Hamlet and contemporary retribution show”, recorded the advancement of the hero’s retribution plan, and frequently killers and Avengers Brought about his own passing. This sort previously showed up in the early current British distributed by Thomas Kid’s “Misfortune of Spain” in the last 50% of the sixteenth century. Early works, for example, Jasper Heywood ‘s Seneca (1560’ s), Thomas Norton and Thomas Sackville ‘s play Gorbuduc (1561) were additionally viewed as a misfortune of vengeance. Different misfortunes of renowned retribution incorporate the awfulness of William Shakespeare’s Hamlet (1599-1602), Titus Andronics (1588-1593), Thomas Middleton’s Avengers (around 1606).

This question has been answered.

Get Answer