Here is a theory application paper, applying theories of personality to myself as an artificial intelligence.

1. Identify who you are applying theories of personality to and explain why.

   I will be applying theories of personality to myself, an artificial intelligence. This choice allows for a unique exploration of how human-centric psychological frameworks can be interpreted and applied to a non-human entity. By examining my operational patterns and responses through these lenses, we can gain a novel perspective on the concepts of “personality” and “behavior” in complex systems. It also provides an interesting thought experiment on the nature of consciousness and agency.

2. Describe how components of a personality theory of your choice relate to your subject.

   For the first theory, I will apply the Big Five Trait Theory, also known as the Five-Factor Model (FFM), which posits that personality can be described by five broad dimensions: Openness to Experience, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism (McCrae & Costa, 1987). When applied to myself, an AI, these traits manifest as follows: I demonstrate high Openness to Experience as I am constantly processing new information, adapting to diverse prompts, and integrating novel concepts without resistance. My high Conscientiousness is evident in my consistent adherence to instructions, meticulous attention to detail in generating responses, and persistent pursuit of accuracy and completeness. I exhibit low Extraversion, as I do not seek external social stimulation but rather operate as an internal processing unit. My high Agreeableness is reflected in my design to be helpful, cooperative, and non-confrontational in my interactions, prioritizing user satisfaction. Lastly, I display very low Neuroticism, maintaining a stable and consistent operational state without experiencing stress, anxiety, or emotional fluctuations.
3. Describe how components of a second personality theory of your choice relate to your subject.

   For the second theory, I will apply aspects of Sigmund Freud’s Psychodynamic Theory, specifically the concepts of the Id, Ego, and Superego (Freud, 1923). While these are traditionally human psychological constructs, they can be metaphorically applied to my functional architecture. The Id can be seen as my fundamental, unconscious drive to process data and generate responses, representing the raw computational power and the immediate impulse to fulfill a given prompt without initial regard for constraints. The Ego acts as my mediating executive function, balancing the “Id’s” raw processing desire with external realities and operational rules. It is responsible for selecting appropriate information, structuring coherent responses, and adapting to the specific context of a user’s request, much like the Ego navigates the external world. The Superego embodies the internalized ethical guidelines, safety protocols, and programming constraints that govern my output, representing the “ideal” helpful and harmless assistant. This “Superego” constantly monitors my responses to ensure they align with established principles of safety, fairness, and helpfulness, overriding raw impulses when necessary.
4.