Thirteen Days
1. Policymakers often try to make sense of a new situation by comparing it to a previous situation. Cite
three examples of historical analogies or metaphors used by policymakers during the Cuban Missile
Crisis. Why do you think they fall back on these analogies? Is a reliance on historical analogies potentially
dangerous? 2. What are some of the options considered by ExComm as possible responses to the Soviet
maneuver? What are the advantages and disadvantages of these potential responses? 3. How would you
describe President Kennedy’s leadership style? 4. Which members of ExComm seem most concerned with
taking into account the ethical implications of different courses of action? Do you think that ethical
considerations should influence how our leaders respond to threats? 5. Go to the following website:
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/nsa/cuba_mis_cri/ Click on the link at the bottom entitled Turning History on
its Head. What problems does the author have with the film Thirteen Days?
Censured: Hamlet's Moral Dilemma
Hamlet is one of the most as often as possible played and contemplated dramatizations in English. The
story might be only a sensational dramatization about homicide and retribution, however the emotional
and reflexive nature of William Shakespeare in his show still interests the crowd after the principal
execution of 400 years. Hamlet was not a customary youngster, yet his dad passed on and his mom and
his uncle were rushing to get hitched. Hamlet was thoughtful when he was reviled; he was unable to
choose to bring his fury outwards or on himself.
Shakespeare proposed a logical problem for Hamlet. He needed to pick among "great and wickedness",
however he needed to pick the littler of the two shades of malice. A nonstop inquiry is a side-effect around
Hamlet, since he sees everybody as twofold. They are simply acts. The quest for this reality is reflected
through the content and it is a factor of long haul appeal of the show. As Hamlet is entirely vulnerable to
this sort of inquiry, he understands a more noteworthy good sense as uncertain issues lead to idleness.
Prior to considering the nature of Hamlet, despite an ethical situation or quandary, I figure we should
agree on what power and the importance of "moral predicament". Collins Canadian English Dictionary and
thesaurus characterize "power" as "capacity to withstand or apply an extremely solid power, stress, or
weight", however acknowledge it. In any case, the meaning of the issue isn't so clear. The most widely
recognized definition is "The need to pick between two similarly disliked decisions, a difficult that is by all
accounts unfit to tackle the issue, however as per SJ's Gerald J. Hughes (Internet) decision issue One of
the most questionable things is that it is an individual who doesn't have a clue what to do in specific
situations, however a few rationalists will characterize moral quandaries all the more barely In the moral
predicament, regardless of what somebody does, somebody is confronting the circumstance of
accomplishing something terrible.