Types of gastrointestinal diseases

 

Describe three (3) different types of gastrointestinal diseases caused by bacteria. Be sure to give the name of the specific organism that causes each, describe some common signs and symptoms, and discuss treatment for each disease:

Sample Solution

Gastrointestinal diseases affect the gastrointestinal (GI) tract from the mouth to the anus. There are two types: functional and structural. Bacteria (E. coli, Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, Clostridium), viruses (Norwalk agent, Rotaviruses), and parasites (Giardia, Entamoeba, Ascaris) can all cause disease in the intestines. Bacterial gastrointestinal infections include foodborne infections and food poisoning. While almost any contaminated food can cause an infection, some foods pose more risks than others. These include: undercooked or raw meat, eggs, or poultry; unpasteurized dairy and juices; food, particularly meat and egg products, that is not refrigerated well; contaminated water; deli meats; and unwashed or raw fruits and vegetables.

about were all encompassing methodologies, diabetes, diseases, and advances across care settings, drug treatment, fall avoidance, constant psychological instability, and mental disability. Proceeding with training units were granted to medical attendants, nursing home executives, and social laborers who went to the gathering (Lockie, 2000). Confirmations Criteria

 

Confirmations models utilized for passage into nursing programs shift among programs. In an assessment of junior colleges confirmations rules, researchers have found an extensive variety of required pre-essential affirmations courses, units, and different measures among programs (Ali, 2008). The writing uncovered the consideration of different scholastic affirmations standards, including GPA, SAT, ACT, NLN, Preadmissions Test, Nurse Entrance Test (NET), and the Written Proficiency Examination (WPE), TEAS. Late worries in regards to grade expansion, and the prescient worth of GPA, has brought about the more regular consideration of state administered tests as a component of the confirmations models in recognizing understudies who are probably going to prevail on the NCLEX-RN (Penprase, 2013). Varieties in the confirmations measures utilized by nursing projects to concede understudies make results appraisal troublesome. Besides, an enormous extent of studies connected with confirmations rules and understudy achievement has been centered around baccalaureate programs. In this manner, scarcely any examinations have tended to program finishing and NCLEX-RN licensure accomplishment at the junior college level, with significantly less examinations connected with the progress of LVN understudies in junior college partner’s certificate enrolled nursing programs (Landry, 2010).

 

Anticipating Success in NCLEX-PN Programs It is vital for audit the reasonable nursing studies and the elements that can foresee accomplishment on the NCLEX-PN. The National League of Nursing (1954) embraced an investigation of 87 viable nursing schools in 1951. The review was to decide the degree to which the National League of Nursing Education (NLNE) choice tests for understudies and certain other individual qualities were connected with execution in the nursing program as well as to meet all requirements for a permit to rehearse. The outcomes showed a positive connection between scores procured on the NLNE preadmission and order assessment and scores on the down to earth nurture evaluation scores and results acquired on the permitting test. The higher preadmission and characterization scores were, the more probable it was that the understudy would follow through with the course (Sayles, 2003). Glade (1964) explored different determination strategies and their viability in foreseeing scholarly achievement and hands on progress of a chose gathering of 214 understudies in a school of commonsense nursing. An endeavor was made to decide if there were certain attributes that recognized the fruitful nursing competitor from the person who fizzled, and whether these qualities can be distinguished ahead of time. The significant finding in this exploration project was that a mix of indicator factors were found that could foresee decently precisely hypothesis grade, accomplishment tests, and State Board Exam scores. The main indicator was the composite score of the NLN pre-affirmation and order test. Seither (1974) explored the prescient legitimacy of chosen affirmation screening measures including 117 down to earth nursing understudies. In particular, the California Short-Form Test of Mental Maturity, the California Reading Test, the California Test of Personality, and the age of the participant were investigated in this review. The outcomes observed that there is a positive relationship old enough towards becoming fruitful in down to earth nursing as estimated in NLN accomplishment scores, licensure test scores, and understudy’s clinical presentation. Perusing cognizance anticipated the majority of the excess change. Leitsch (1988) endeavored to recognize factors that anticipate outcome in useful nursing programs and to distinguish scholastically lacking understudies. Level of instructive fulfillment as estimated by end of (GED) program, secondary everyday schedule courses were not viewed as a valuable indicator of progress in LPN programs. The capacity of orientation to foresee achievement was restricted. Albeit the review viewed age as connected with entry or disappointment of the LPN Exit Competency Test, in general age was not a decent indicator of progress in LPN programs. Race likewise was not an indicator of progress. Trial of Adult Basic Education (TABE) perusing scores represented the biggest level of difference in every one of the basis factors in both single and different relapse examination. The R was 0.0740 for the difference in entry or disappointment of the LPN Assessment Test (AT) represented by TABE understanding scores. TABE math scores represented just a little percent of the change (7T = 0.0151). Quick’s (1989) investigation of 1,254 functional nursing understudies in 12 postsecondary schools in Georgia exhibited no massive contrast between paces of program fulfillment for either

This question has been answered.

Get Answer