Values can be found in the individual, ethics in groups or organizations, and laws in larger societies. What other differences are there between values, ethics, and laws? Why are there ethics for counselors? Depending on your program of study, which codes of ethics will you abide by and why? How can the ACA, AACC, NAADAC, or applicable professional code of ethics help you in providing treatment to someone with different values than your own?
Values, ethics and laws are all distinct but related concepts that describe a society’s morality and how it is enforced. Values are the beliefs, principles and standards held by an individual or group; they define a code of conduct that guides behavior and serves as a source of personal integrity (Bok, 1984). Ethics, on the other hand, refers to the moral principles accepted by a specific community or organization; these concepts provide guidance for decision making in particular contexts (Shaw & Barry, 2019). Finally, laws represent rules which have been imposed upon society by higher authorities such as governments and courts; they serve to regulate citizens’ behavior according to established codes of conduct with binding consequences for those who disobey them (Friedman & Friedman 1980).
Counselors must abide by certain ethical codes due to their unique role in forming relationships with clients. The American Counseling Association (ACA), for example, has issued its Code of Ethics which outlines professional responsibilities relating to client welfare such as maintaining respect for human dignity and confidentiality regarding any information shared with the counseling session (ACA 2017). Similarly, the British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy (BACP) has created its own ethical framework outlining counselors’ responsibilities towards creating a safe space for clients where trust is paramount (BACP 2018). Abiding by these codes ensures that counselors can remain true to their values while providing effective services without compromising their clients’ interests.
In conclusion then, we can see how values represent personal convictions whereas ethics refer more generally to acceptable forms of moral behavior within certain contexts. Laws meanwhile impose necessary regulations on any given society so as to protect citizens from harm or exploitation. As professionals whose primary job is helping others achieve emotional well-being through meaningful dialogue, it is essential that counselors adhere strictly to established ethical codes so as to ensure both parties remain treated fairly during every interaction.
The Revenger’s Tragedy
Misfortune of Avengers What sort of misfortune is this? By definition, the misfortune is “a staggering, excruciating, dismal occasion”. Notwithstanding, the awfulness of Avengers doesn’t uncover every one of these highlights. It is frightful and abnormal, loaded with wicked, brutal, dead and maniacal grisly clarifications, however this is certainly not a dismal story. Instead of cause the crowd to feel distress, they regularly draw mind blowing doubtful feelings. The reason for the misfortune isn’t inefficient sorrow, however to utilize retaliation as a persuading intends to cause contempt.
Shakespeare’s “Hamlet” shows the overall components found in the awfulness of the retribution of the renaissance (“misfortune of vengeance”). Be that as it may, despite the fact that Hamlet is a misfortune of vengeance, Shakespeare confounds the essential retribution plot by making three vengeance plots. By including significant advancements, Shakespeare makes ‘Ship of the Concentric Revenge Miwa’ (Frye 90) which is definitely not a physical legend yet a phantom, not an apparition, yet a scholarly saint who is an issue. did. viewpoint
In this investigation of retribution and vengeance of Elizabeth ‘s vengeance, the two plays I see are the “Hamlet” of William Shakespeare and “The Tragedy of Avengers” of Thomas Middleton. After first observing the treatment of the dramatist ‘s Avengers’ character, different characters in the play will deal with the Avengers. Despite the fact that their essential topic and shows are comparable, the two plays show a differentiating picture of vengeance; rather than “Vindicator’s misfortune”, Hamlet is an increasingly complex of his hero Provide treatment restricted by the creator’s social data and lacking
The awfulness of vengeance (some of the time called retribution dramatization, vengeance show or grisly misfortune) is a sort of hypothesis whose fundamental subject is the deadly aftereffect of vengeance and retribution. American instructor Ashley H. Thorndiek formally reported the awfulness of vengeance in the 1902 article “Connection among Hamlet and contemporary retribution show”, recorded the advancement of the hero’s retribution plan, and frequently killers and Avengers Brought about his own passing. This sort previously showed up in the early current British distributed by Thomas Kid’s “Misfortune of Spain” in the last 50% of the sixteenth century. Early works, for example, Jasper Heywood ‘s Seneca (1560’ s), Thomas Norton and Thomas Sackville ‘s play Gorbuduc (1561) were additionally viewed as a misfortune of vengeance. Different misfortunes of renowned retribution incorporate the awfulness of William Shakespeare’s Hamlet (1599-1602), Titus Andronics (1588-1593), Thomas Middleton’s Avengers (around 1606).