Variety of things that consumers consider when making the decision

at
Categories
Tags

 

 

As a current or future health care executive, it is important to weigh the variety of things that consumers consider when making the decision to subscribe to health services offered by your health care organization. For what are your consumers looking, and what drives them to choose your health care organization? What are some of the items on which you need to reflect that consumers will use to drive their decision to utilize your health services?

For this Discussion, review the resources for this week and reflect on those considerations consumers keep in mind when selecting a health care organization to meet their health care needs. Think about what aspects of health care delivery in your health care organization, or one with which you are familiar, might be considered most important for a consumer to take into account when selecting where to receive health care.

 

Post a description of two different things that a consumer might consider when evaluating whether or not your health care organization will meet his or her health care needs. Provide a detailed explanation of each item and rationale for why a consumer would look at these items when making a decision. Be specific, and provide examples.

 

 

Sample Solution

Healthcare consumers are the key stakeholders in patient-centered and patient-driven care. Consumers play a critical role in the medical decision-making process, making choices that ultimately impact the value of care delivered on both individual and societal level. As a result, healthcare consumerism has been identified as a powerful tool to accelerate changes in the delivery of care (Binder, 2008). Consumers are savvy and are able to evaluate critically information about quality. Consumers are most concerned about costs of coverage and technical competence. Consumers on fixed incomes pay close attention to their out-of-pocket expenses and would benefit greatly from a method of determining those costs that reflect their own health problems.

The transdermal fix has numerous positive attributes, making it a powerful intercession. One potential gain to this technique for nicotine substitution treatment is that it is not difficult to utilize; a client just applies it to their skin and doesn’t need to stress over it for the afternoon (Wadgave and Nagesh, 2016). Different mediations require consideration, which could make adherence hard for certain clients. One more advantage to the treatment is that the fix gives a consistent measure of nicotine, permitting it to endure longer than different treatments, for example, gums or capsules which are fleeting concerning their remedial impacts (Wadgave and Nagesh, 2016). All the more significantly, this type of treatment is the most un-habit-forming in view of its continuous arrival of nicotine (Wadgave and Nagesh, 2016). For some, this is a successful treatment as they can diminish their measurements until they feel sufficiently good to live without nicotine and tobacco.

The transdermal fix additionally has many cons to it; one of the cons of this type of recovery is that the client might have skin responses (Wadgave and Nagesh, 2016). To stay away from this, it is suggested that the client switches the position of their fix. Another con is that the fix doesn’t treat capably intense desires for nicotine not at all like the gum or capsule. In this manner, uses might fall back on other nicotine items while on the fix to fulfill that craving (Wadgave and Nagesh, 2016). This might cause an episode of backslide on the off chance that the client can’t deal with areas of strength for them desires. Nicotine glut is conceivable if one smokes or uses one more type of nicotine substitution treatment while on the fix. Moreover, rest unsettling influences are one more symptom of the fix, particularly for the people who wear them for 24 hours (Wadgave and Nagesh, 2016). There are different advantages and disadvantages to consider when concluded which type of nicotine substitution is proper; regardless, the nicotine fix has been demonstrated to be viable in aiding many live sans tobacco (Wadgave and Nagesh, 2016).

This question has been answered.

Get Answer