Victims Advocacy-

 

 

Compare and contrast the differences of the Uniform Crime Report (UCR) and the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS).

Essay, please respond to the following prompts:

What crimes overlap/don’t overlap in the two reports? Why?
Why are there discrepancies between statistics from the two programs?
Why is it useful or important for crime definitions to differ in the two reports?
Knowing that these measurement pieces were designed to be used in tandem, what changes would you suggest to make these reports more reliable?

 

 

Sample Solution

Victims Advocacy

The Uniform Crime Report (UCR), launched in 1929, collects information reported to law enforcement agencies on the following crimes: murder and non-negligent homicide, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, and human trafficking among others. The National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) is the national`s primary source of information on criminal victimization. The most important distinction between the two is that the UCR reports information regarding crimes known to law enforcement agencies (but cannot reflect unreported crime), while the NCVS measures reported and unreported victimization, helping researchers identify “the dark figure of crime”-those hidden victimization. Because BJS designed the NCVS in part to complement the UCR program, the two programs share many similarities. As much as their different collection methods permit, the two measure the same subject of serious crimes: rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, theft, and motor vehicle theft.

 

In spite of the fact that regularly an eclipsed individual inside the captivativing character that is Martin Luther King, Jr., Coretta Scott King produced Martin’s accomplishments further both inside the Civil Rights Movement just as the years going before his death. It is inside her life account, titled Coretta: My Life, My Love, My Legacy, that Coretta Scott states, “obviously, while my diary is about me, it is about Martin, as well. Our lives were too indistinguishable to be in any way punctured. Cutting us one from the other would leave a spiked edge. However, I had an actual existence after Martin, similarly as I had a real existence before Martin. I have a reason. I have a crucial, I have done it on the world stage.” (Scott King and Reynolds 2). Through her proceeded with activism in the Movement and years going before Martin’s passing, Coretta Scott King encouraged an everlasting heritage for King, bringing Martin, herself, and supporters closer to the much of the time referenced “guarantee land.” (King 5).

With a splendid and promising music profession not too far off, Coretta was given the decision of following music or Martin. In her 1969 account, My Life with Martin Luther King, Jr.. Coretta opens up with respect to her worry originating from Martin’s dialog on early marriage. Coretta ended up thinking about taking a chance with the loss of her music vocation or losing her opportunity to wed King (Scott King 56). In the long run, these worries would die down and Coretta would assume the title of Mrs. Coretta Scott King. As the years passed, Coretta embraced numerous jobs inside the development, helping in King’s work. In her article, “Coretta Scott King and the Struggle for Civil and Human Rights: An Enduring Legacy”, Vicki Crawford states, “During these years Coretta Scott King kept up a promise to harmony and social liberties exercises, joining her significant other at walks, showings, and on trips the world over at whatever point conceivable. Simultaneously, Coretta King attempted to keep up some similarity to “ordinary” family life for the youngsters. She moved her better half to and from the air terminal, got kids from school, assisted with schoolwork, arranged dinners, while remaining over the development’s advancements.” (Crawford 110-111). In a similar article, Crawford furnishes proof to Coretta’s work with the development and the manners by which she figured out how to consolidate her melodic ability. The article expresses that Coretta had the option to have “opportunity shows” in different scenes which consequently carried both mindfulness and money related help to the Movement (Crawford 112). In spite of the fact that Coretta’s decision to wed Martin overwhelmed her melodic future, it started the start of her association with the Civil Rights Movement.

Coretta’s development contribution didn’t stop to exist with “opportunity shows”, rather, she wanted to walk close by Martin and individuals from the network. Adjusting her job as mother, spouse, and open figure Coretta made progress to satisfy all jobs as well as could be expected. Lord even goes on about his better half’s essence inside the development. In Stride Toward Freedom King states, “My better half and I got up sooner than expected on Monday morning. We were up and completely dressed by five-thirty. The day for the dissent had shown up, and we were resolved to see the primary demonstration of this unfurling dramatization.” (King, Jr. 41). As King was setting out occasions toward the development, Coretta remained adjacent to him in solidarity. Shockingly, Coretta’s job as spouse frequently eclipsed her enthusiasm for the development, keeping her activism down in specific cases. In Stephen J. Wermiel and Robert E. Stein’s diary article, “Human Rights Hero: Coretta Scott King”, it states, “During the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom (March) in 1963, she was not permitted to walk with her better half and different pioneers, as the occasion’s Planning Council had chosen that solitary the top administration would stroll in the March.” (Wermiel and Stein 25). The article proceeds to cite Coretta featuring her mistake with this choice. Coretta Scott King felt the significance of her own activism and the spouses of the pioneers was incredibly undermined (Wermiel and Stein 25). Coretta Scott King was at this point to realize that her activism would be lifted in just five brief years. Despite the fact that incredibly unpredicted and heartbreaking, Coretta’s inclusion in crafted by the development and Martin would build following King’s death.

Following the passing of her dearest Martin, one would have expected for Coretta to remove strides from the Movement. Rather than upbraiding the development, Coretta dove into keeping King’s work. Laura T. McCarty addresses this in her book, Coretta Scott King: A Biography. McCarty states, “She was resolved to accomplish more than bring up youngsters. She was focused on observing that her significant other’s work was continued.” (McCarty 58). Coretta was positively mindful of the troubles that would pursue her in her steps to encourage a development that as of late lost its most powerful pioneer. Despite the fact that uncertain in where to set her first walks, Coretta Scott King would before long start her continuation of King’s work and heritage. McCarty states, “Coretta’s vision of how to memorialize Martin incorporated a few parts. She felt emphatically that the area wherein he grew up and worked ought to be saved and improved as vacation spots. She additionally planned to gather and utilize his works and those of other social liberties gatherings to save the narratives of the development.” (McCarty 57). In the long run, Coretta Scott King would have built what was to be known as the “Martin Luther King, Jr., Center for Nonviolent Social Change, Inc.” (Crawford 113). Through her consolidation of King’s homegrown nature just as his persuasive work, Coretta ensured a venturing stone for the still present and developing development. Through this specific dedication, Coretta had given the network a guide that could be developed, with expectations of in the long run driving the network to the “guaranteed land.” (5).

Coretta Scott King produced numerous ways to keep King’s work, made effective by her capacity to draw on King’s oral nearness, rally for further change, just as build up enduring national familiarity with King. In his personal history And the Walls Came Tumbling Down, Ralph David Abernathy acquaints crowds with Coretta’s oral fascination. Abernathy states, “Thousands came to hear Coretta King give a blending discourse, calling for “dark ladies, white ladies, darker ladies, and red ladies—every one of the ladies of this country—[to join] in a battle of inner voice. She called for welfare change, and a rebuilding of advantages for ladies with kids, saying: “Our Congress passes laws which sponsor organization ranches, oil organizations, carriers and houses for the suburbs, however when it directs its concentration toward poor people, it all of a sudden gets worried about adjusting the spending limit.”” (Abernathy 511). In spite of the fact that no adversary to the crowds that assembled to hear King’s words, Coretta’s capacity to attract upon thousands addresses the craving of an enduring heritage. A significant part of the books and articles draw upon Coretta’s extension of Martin’s activism through her open and private exchanges.. Specifically, The King Center’s site states, “Coretta Scott King enthusiastically conveyed the message of peacefulness and the fantasy of the adored network to pretty much every edge of our country and globe.” (Thekingcenter.org).While Martin’s work was engaged in America, in the long run stemming to Vietnam, Coretta took his belief systems and made them overall marvels. The King Center’s site goes forward to state, “During her lifetime, Mrs. Ruler discourse with heads of state, including PMs and presidents, just as partaking in fights close by typical working individuals all things considered.” (Thekingcenter.org). Coretta Scott King’s capacity to advocate for those people disregarded or not yet referenced in King’s work with the development enabled her to facilitate a collective push towards King’s referenced “guaranteed land.” (5).

In spite of the fact that the spreading of his philosophies encouraged his work, Coretta’s capacity to make national familiarity with King ensured a heritage that would even outlast her. In her continuation of Martin’s work, Coretta felt that it was important to have a complete sign of the obstruction breaking work King accomplished during his lifetime. In the end, Coretta had the option to go through Congress a national occasion that would respect the heritage of Martin Luther King, Jr. Crawford states, “Coretta King drove the campaigning efforts to build up Dr. Ruler’s birthday as a government occasion, the main national occasion to be named to pay tribute to an African American.” (Crawford 114). As referenced on The King Center’s site, “… in January 1986, Mrs. Lord regulated the main legitimate occasion out of appreciation for her significant other an occasion which has come to be commended by a huge number of individuals worldwide and, in some structure, in more than 100 nations.” (thekingcenter.org). Martin Luther King, Jr. day stays as the main day celebrated for a solitary individual, an incredible portrayal of King’s work to advance and further the African-American individuals, and simply the general total populace.

As the years advanced, Coretta Scott King would accomplish unquestionably increasingly, both with work to pay tribute to King just as work she believed she was called upon. The character that Coretta Scott King showed enables one to determine various considerations concerning King as a person. Lord was an accomplished man, a committed minister, and exceptional pioneer in activism. It isn’t foolish to state that if anybody somehow happened to equal crafted by Dr. Lord it would surely be his significant other. Martin was a man of prudence and he obviously applied the qualities and convictions of his confidence to each choice he had made. Ruler’s choice to wed Coretta was not one he thought upon as straightforward. Dr. Ruler has decided to wed a lady who held God as high as he did. Coretta was incredibl

 

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.