Watch the above video link. Then write a three-paragraph critique using the Mini Video Critique Guidelines.
Make sure you included the information listed above (including title, music, and choreographer) about the piece in the opening paragraph. Also, remember that your readers have NOT seen this piece so do your best to describe it to them within your critique.
Mini Video Critique Guidelines
You will have 2 short video critiques that will prep you for your full video critique. Each of these is worth 75 points for a total of 150 points for both.
For each mini-video critique you need to write three paragraph critique format with a minimum of 5 sentences in each paragraph. The critique will start with an introduction paragraph that clearly states what piece you saw and all the details about the piece (including title, choreographer, music and all information given to you). You must also have a thesis that tells the reader what you will be discussing in the body of the essay. You will follow with one support paragraph that covers the details of the piece you saw. Ask yourself questions about the movements, genres, choreographers, time in history, costumes, dancers and more. Finally, in your third paragraph, you will wrap it up for the reader, briefly recapping the important items and helping the reader know why these details are relevant.
You should write your critique with the idea that your readers have not seen the pieces and have no knowledge of them. You must paint a clear picture of the pieces without just writing step by step details of the story you envision. Think about the important details and how you can discuss them in an interesting way to grab your readers. You will be given all the program information for the pieces you have to watch, but it is advised to do outside reach to support your thoughts.
Suggestions for things that could be included or places to look for ideas to begin when watching videos:
Can you apply class terminology to the description of the performance?
Analyze what you drew you into the piece and what kept you out (likes and dislikes) and explain why or why not.
Identify production elements: costumes, music/sound, lights, props, stage design
Describe the movements.
Did the choreography hold your attention? How did it convey the theme or atmosphere of the piece? What were the mood, images and ideas conveyed?
Was the program based on a narrative/storyline or more abstract?
What style of dance (s) could you identify (i.e. ballet, modern, jazz, ethnic, etc.)?
What could have been done to enhance the performance?
Do you think seeing this piece on video made it different then if you saw it in a theatre live?
Amit Kumar Dwivedi and D. Kumara Charyulu in their examination paper “Productivity of Indian Banking Industry in the Post-Reform Era (2011)” have decided the effect of different market and administrative activities on effectiveness upgrades of Indian banks. They reasoned that change procedure has prompted a progressively proficient and benefit situated industry. The implantation of private value capital has made difficulties to investors and prompted bureaucratic basic leadership. The change procedure has extemporized the conventional banking and made innovation based banking.
R.K. Uppal in his examination “Worldwide Crisis: Problems and Prospects for Indian Banking Industry (2011)”, has analyzed the banks’ effectiveness in the post-banking area changes time for the timespan somewhere in the range of 1999 and 2006. The investigation verified that open part banks have improved their monetary situation in the period, yet banks despite everything need to roll out numerous improvements. The examination closed effectiveness of new private area banks is high, when contrasted with other Indian banks however outside banks have upper hand over new private part banks.
Omprakash K.Gupta, Yogesh Doshit and Aneesh Chinubhai in their investigation “Elements of Productive Efficiency of Indian Banks (2008)”, have examined the presentation of the Indian financial part in two phases. Non-parametric wilderness strategy DEA and TOBIT model have been utilized to develop gainful information sources. The yields are estimated and productivity scores have been resolved for the time of 1999-2003. The effectiveness is estimated regarding capital ampleness; the examination infers that the State Bank of India has most noteworthy proficiency level followed by private banks and other nationalized banks.
S. S. Rajan, K. L. N. Reddy and V. Pandit in their examination paper “Proficiency and Productivity Growth in Indian Banking (2011)”, have analyzed the specialized effectiveness and efficiency execution of Indian booked business banks, for the period 1979-2008. Utilizing semi-parametric estimation techniques they have model a different yield/numerous info innovation creation wilderness.
P.S Subbarao in his examination “Changing Paradigm in Indian Banking, Gyan Management (2007)” has inferred that Indian banking has experienced change from household banking to the global banking. Mergers and acquisitions, globalization of players, advancement of new innovation, all inclusive banking and human asset in banking, productivity, provincial banking and hazard the board are the significant patterns that change the financial business internationally. The significant difficulties that the financial business face in India are the capital sufficiency standards under Basel I and II, mechanical advancements and organized commerce understandings